0
Correspondence |

Moist Toilet Paper: Allergy to the Nonhalogenated Derivative Methylisothiazolinone Preservative Alone

Juan García-Gavín, MD; An Goossens, PhD
[+] Author Affiliations

Copyright 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(10):1186-1186. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.279
Text Size: A A A
Published online

We read with great interest the article by Gardner et al1 in the August issue of the Archives. In our opinion, the authors fail to distinguish between 2 different preservatives: the mixture in a 3:1 ratio of methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) and the nonhalogenated derivative MI alone, which is, according to the article, contained in Cottonelle moist toilet paper (Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Neenah, Wisconsin).

In Europe, MCI/MI has been widely used in cosmetics at a maximum concentration of 15 ppm.2 In both Europe and the United States, MI alone has recently been approved for use in cosmetics at up to 100 ppm, either in leave-on or rinse-off products.2 As a biocide, it is less effective than MCI/MI, and hence it requires a higher use concentration, which was believed to be safe because MI alone is a much weaker sensitizer than MCI and therefore has been considered a good alternative to the MCI/MI combination.3

We recently have observed 7 cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) induced by MI, 6 of which occurred after the use of MI-containing moist toilet paper.4 As in 3 of the 4 cases reported by Gardner et al,1 Kimberly-Clark was the manufacturer of the involved product in our cases. Five of the 6 patients were patch tested with MI at 1000 ppm, which resulted in strong positive reactions in all cases. However, results of patch testing with the MCI/MI mixture at 100 ppm were negative in 2 patients, which is probably explained by a too-low MI concentration.

Occupational ACD caused by MI has been previously reported,5 6 thus demonstrating the potential of this substance to elicit and induce contact allergy. We estimate that the inclusion of MI as a preservative in cosmetics might not represent the solution to the problem of ACD from isothiazolinones. Moreover, considering both our European cases or the American patients described by Gardner et al,1 we may be witnessing an epidemic of ACD from this “brand new” substance. Furthermore, not only patients who are previously sensitized to the MCI/MI mixture may react to products containing MI alone but also patients who were primarily sensitized to MI may react to products containing the MCI/MI combination chemical. We strongly believe that the use of MI as a preservative in cosmetics, especially in leave-on products and wipes, might thus need to be more thoroughly regulated.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr García-Gavín, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, San Francisco sin número, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain (juangavin@gmail.com).

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

REFERENCES

Gardner  KH, Davis  MD, Richardson  DM, Pittelkow  MR. The hazards of moist toilet paper: allergy to the preservative methylchloroisothiazolinone/ methylisothiazolinone. Arch Dermatol 2010;146 (8) 886- 890
PubMed
The Cosmetics Directorate of the European Union,  Directives 89/174/EEC and 2005/42/EEC: Annex VI: List of Preservatives Which Cosmetic Products May Contain. http://www.aseancosmetics.org/docdocs/Annexe_VI_(Ref_No._Order)_02_December_2009.pdf3 August2010;
The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers,  SCCNFP/0805/04: opinion concerning methylisothiazolinone: COLIPA No. P 94. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/sccp/documents/out270_en.pdf3 August2010;
García-Gavín  J, Vansina  S, Kerre  S, Naert  A, Goossens  A. Methylisothiazolinone, an emerging allergen in cosmetics? Contact Dermatitis 2010;63 (2) 96- 101
PubMed
Isaksson  M, Gruvberger  B, Bruze  M. Occupational contact allergy and dermatitis from methylisothiazolinone after contact with wallcovering glue and after a chemical burn from a biocide. Dermatitis 2004;15 (4) 201- 205
PubMed
Thyssen  JP, Sederberg-Olsen  N, Thomsen  JF, Menné  T. Contact dermatitis from methylisothiazolinone in a paint factory. Contact Dermatitis 2006;54 (6) 322- 324
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Gardner  KH, Davis  MD, Richardson  DM, Pittelkow  MR. The hazards of moist toilet paper: allergy to the preservative methylchloroisothiazolinone/ methylisothiazolinone. Arch Dermatol 2010;146 (8) 886- 890
PubMed
The Cosmetics Directorate of the European Union,  Directives 89/174/EEC and 2005/42/EEC: Annex VI: List of Preservatives Which Cosmetic Products May Contain. http://www.aseancosmetics.org/docdocs/Annexe_VI_(Ref_No._Order)_02_December_2009.pdf3 August2010;
The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers,  SCCNFP/0805/04: opinion concerning methylisothiazolinone: COLIPA No. P 94. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/sccp/documents/out270_en.pdf3 August2010;
García-Gavín  J, Vansina  S, Kerre  S, Naert  A, Goossens  A. Methylisothiazolinone, an emerging allergen in cosmetics? Contact Dermatitis 2010;63 (2) 96- 101
PubMed
Isaksson  M, Gruvberger  B, Bruze  M. Occupational contact allergy and dermatitis from methylisothiazolinone after contact with wallcovering glue and after a chemical burn from a biocide. Dermatitis 2004;15 (4) 201- 205
PubMed
Thyssen  JP, Sederberg-Olsen  N, Thomsen  JF, Menné  T. Contact dermatitis from methylisothiazolinone in a paint factory. Contact Dermatitis 2006;54 (6) 322- 324
PubMed

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles