A 76-year-old man recalled that 30 years before consultation he had sustained a hot water burn to both lower legs, which had resulted in extensive blisters that had taken 5 weeks to heal. Two years before consultation, 2 small keratotic papules had developed on his right lower leg that were excised by his local physician. The pathologic findings had been reported as well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with lichenoid inflammation. Seven months later, the papules recurred, were reexcised, and were reported as showing only pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with lichenoid inflammation. One year before consultation, 2 infiltrated nodules developed on his other leg. A punch biopsy specimen was reported as squamous cell carcinoma with lichenoid inflammation. He was referred to a plastic surgeon, who excised both lesions on the left calf and performed skin grafts. The surgical specimen showed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with lichenoid inflammation. Two months later, 2 keratotic and infiltrated papules on the right calf were removed, with skin grafting. The pathologic findings were reported as representing keratoacanthomas. During the subsequent 6 months, both grafts developed recurrent nodules. At the time of his initial consultation at our center, there were 2 violaceous hyperkeratotic nodules measuring 2 cm in diameter within the graft on the right calf and a violaceous papule within a scar below the graft. The left skin graft was totally replaced by confluent keratotic and verrucous nodules that were separated by fissures (Figure 3A). The skin graft donor site was unaffected. There was no associated lymphadenopathy, and the rest of the clinical examination showed no evidence of lichen planus or other skin cancers. The patient was taking prazosin hydrochloride, dipyridamole, and temazepam, as well as perindopril erbumine, which had been substituted for amlodipine besylate 1 month before consultation. A biopsy specimen taken from the verrucous keratotic plaque from the left graft showed multiple infundibulocystic cavities partially outlined by lichenoid inflammation. These extended into the deep dermis. Under the base of the cystic cavities, there were irregular cords of keratinocytes that showed premature keratinization and focal nuclear atypia (Figure 3B). A biopsy specimen from the nodule on the right calf showed a central cavity, under which there were lobular clusters of keratinocytes extending into the mid dermis (Figure 3C). In areas, there was an infundibulocystic component, and the lobules were associated with focal lichenoid inflammation. There was focal nuclear atypia and a disorganized pattern of maturation. The biopsy specimen of the papule below the graft and within a scar showed changes that were identical to those seen with hypertrophic lichen planus. These findings were equated with squamous cell carcinoma arising in the background of lichenoid pseudoepitheliomatous infundibulocystic hyperplasia and hypertrophic lichen planus–like reaction. Acitretin was prescribed at a dosage of 25 mg daily, and within a month, the nodules over both grafts were disintegrating and the infiltrative areas were resolving. The violaceous plaque below the graft on the right leg had resolved. The dosage of acitretin was reduced to 10 mg daily, but 4 months later, 2 further nodules emerged over the left graft and the treatment regimen acitretin was again increased to 20 mg daily, with clearance. At the 10-month follow-up, all areas were free of tumor, including the left graft (Figure 3D). The acitretin regimen was continued for 2 years and then discontinued, without recurrence after 6 months of stopping the drug.