0
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.19.47.197. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letter |

Gender Differences in Melanoma Awareness and Detection Practices Between Middle-aged and Older Men With Melanoma and Their Female Spouses FREE

Susan M. Swetter, MD; Christle J. Layton, MD; Timothy M. Johnson, MD; Katie R. Brooks, MPH; Donald R. Miller, ScD; Alan C. Geller, MPH, RN
Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(4):488-490. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2009.42.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Invasive melanoma incidence and mortality rates have risen most steeply in the United States in middle-aged and older men. From 1969 to 1999, melanoma incidence increased 3-fold in middle-aged men and 5-fold in older men. During this period, mortality rates increased 66% in middle-aged men and 157% in older men compared with 19% and 49% in women in these age groups, respectively.1

Men are less likely than women to examine their own skin, seek physician examinations for melanoma, or examine the skin of their spouses.24 Observed sex differences in melanoma awareness and detection practices have previously been reported in population-based studies of average-risk individuals and in siblings of patients with melanoma.5,6 Our aim was to compare awareness and screening practices in middle-aged and older men with melanoma with those of their unaffected female spouses and/or partners (hereinafter “female spouses”; only 7 of 158 women [4%] identified themselves as partners). Such information would be useful in planning family-based interventions to enhance early detection of melanoma in this high-risk group.

Male patients 40 years or older with invasive cutaneous melanoma and their female spouses were surveyed concurrently within 3 months of diagnosis at Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California; and the University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, from September 1, 2004, through January 31, 2006, as described elsewhere in this issue of the Archives.7 After providing their informed consent, couples were asked to complete surveys without consulting each other. Most survey questions pertained to the year prior to the man's melanoma diagnosis.

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina). Each measure was dichotomized, and the responses of men and their female spouses were compared using the McNemar χ2 test for paired data. We report P values and assume statistical significance at α = .05.

A total of 164 men of a larger cohort7 had female spouses, 6 of whom declined to participate (4% female spouse refusal rate); 158 couples completed dual surveys. Ninety-eight percent of female spouses lived with the affected man, and 94% had known him for at least 10 years.

The results of our analysis are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. Female spouses were more likely than their husbands to (1) be aware of the ABCD rule (asymmetry, border irregularity, color variegation, and diameter >6 mm) (31% vs 18%) (P = .004); (2) read information about skin cancer detection (85% vs 65%) (P < .001); (3) perform skin self-examination (58% vs 46%) (P = .04); and (4) use sunscreen regularly (55% vs 32%) (P < .001), despite having lower levels of education (16% college education or beyond vs 52% for men) (P < .001). Men agreed or strongly agreed that their female spouses (1) ensured that the men went to see a physician (80%); (2) kept in touch with health matters better than the men did (69%); and (3) helped the men with skin self-examination (62%).

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Demographics and Risk Factors of Men With Newly Diagnosed Melanoma and Their Female Spouses
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Skin Cancer Prevention and Skin Self-examination Practices and Use of Health Information by Men With Newly Diagnosed Melanoma and Their Unaffected Female Spousesa

We sought to determine melanoma awareness and risk-reduction practices in the year prior to diagnosis for men with newly diagnosed melanoma and their unaffected female spouses. While other studies8,9 have demonstrated sex differences regarding melanoma awareness, ours is unique to our knowledge in its concurrent examination of awareness and detection practices in male patients and their unaffected female spouses. Despite having equal sun sensitivity and only half the rates of personal and/or family history of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer, female spouses had greater melanoma awareness and risk-reduction practices than the men.

Recognition of the unique role of the female spouse is crucial to improving screening and skin self-examination (SSE) efforts in middle-aged and older men. Sex differences in SSE have been demonstrated, and earlier detection of melanoma by women is attributable, at least in part, to their greater health information–seeking practices.10 Schwartz et al11 found that women had significantly thinner primary melanomas than men, but men and women had equally thin second primary melanomas. Increased levels of awareness in both men and women were believed to contribute to detection of thinner subsequent melanomas, and these results suggest that heightened awareness can lead to earlier detection.

Joint education of patients and their partners may improve secondary prevention for melanoma. Robinson et al12 demonstrated significant improvement in SSE through couples training compared with solo learning in a randomized, controlled intervention designed to enhance partner participation. Efficacy of SSE improved with increasing quality of the couple's relationship and the partner's motivation and ability to provide social support.13

Possible study limitations, as described previously,8 include reliance on self-reported information, recall bias, and uncontrolled findings resulting from potential differences in study sites.

In conclusion, female spouses should be made aware of their potential to improve their husbands' melanoma screening practices. Health fairs, common to many areas, should consider integrating melanoma screening into existing women's health services. How to publicize and frame messages to draw men's attention and participation warrants further attention.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr Swetter, Department of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center, 900 Blake Wilbur Dr, W0069, Stanford, CA 94305 (sswetter@stanford.edu).

Author Contributions: All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Swetter, Johnson, Miller, and Geller. Acquisition of data: Swetter, Layton, and Johnson. Analysis and interpretation of data: Swetter, Layton, Brooks, and Geller. Drafting of the manuscript: Swetter, Layton, Johnson, Brooks, Miller, and Geller. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Swetter, Johnson, and Geller. Statistical analysis: Brooks and Miller. Obtained funding: Swetter and Geller. Administrative, technical, and material support: Swetter, Johnson, and Geller. Study supervision: Swetter and Geller.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was funded by the Harry J. Lloyd Charitable Trust for Melanoma Research, Overland Park, Kansas.

Role of the Sponsor: The sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in the preparation of the manuscript, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Additional Contributions: Mitzi C. Rabe, RN, BSN, OCN, served as study coordinator at the University of Michigan. The Melanoma Prevention Working Group provided valuable contributions to the study design and analysis.

Geller  ACMiller  DRAnnas  GDDemierre  MFGilchrest  BAKoh  HK Melanoma incidence and mortality among US whites, 1968-1999. JAMA 2002;288 (14) 1719- 1720
PubMed Link to Article
Brady  MSOliveria  SAChristos  PJ  et al.  Patterns of detection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 2000;89 (2) 342- 347
PubMed Link to Article
Koh  HKMiller  DRGeller  ACClapp  RWMercer  MBLew  RA Who discovers melanoma? patterns from a population-based survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;26 (6) 914- 919
PubMed Link to Article
Robinson  JKRigel  DSAmonette  RA What promotes skin-self examination? J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38 (5, pt 1) 752- 757
PubMed Link to Article
Miller  DRGeller  ACWyatt  SW  et al.  Melanoma awareness and self-examination practices: results of a United States survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34 (6) 962- 970
PubMed Link to Article
Geller  ACEmmons  KBrooks  DR  et al.  Skin cancer prevention and detection practices among siblings of patients with melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49 (4) 631- 638
PubMed Link to Article
Swetter  SMJohnson  TMMiller  DRLayton  CJBrooks  KRGeller  AC Melanoma in middle-aged and older men: a multi-institutional survey study of factors related to tumor thickness. Arch Dermatol 2009;145 (4) 397- 404
Melia  JHarland  CMoss  SEiser  JRPendry  L Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study. Br J Cancer 2000;82 (9) 1605- 1609
PubMed Link to Article
Brandberg  YBolund  CMichelson  HMansson-Brahme  ERingborg  USjoden  PO Perceived susceptibility to and knowledge of malignant melanoma: screening participants vs the general population. Prev Med 1996;25 (2) 170- 177
PubMed Link to Article
Weinstock  MAMartin  RARisica  PM  et al.  Thorough skin examination for the early detection of melanoma. Am J Prev Med 1999;17 (3) 169- 175
PubMed Link to Article
Schwartz  JLWang  TSHamilton  TALowe  LSondak  VKJohnson  TM Thin primary cutaneous melanomas: associated detection patterns, lesion characteristics, and patient characteristics. Cancer 2002;95 (7) 1562- 1568
PubMed Link to Article
Robinson  JKTurrisi  RStapleton  BS Efficacy of a partner assistance intervention design to increase skin self-examination performance. Arch Dermatol 2007;143 (1) 37- 41
PubMed Link to Article
Robinson  JKStapleton  JTurrisi  R Relationship and partner moderator variables increase self-efficacy of performing skin self-examination. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58 (5) 755- 762
PubMed Link to Article

Figures

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Demographics and Risk Factors of Men With Newly Diagnosed Melanoma and Their Female Spouses
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Skin Cancer Prevention and Skin Self-examination Practices and Use of Health Information by Men With Newly Diagnosed Melanoma and Their Unaffected Female Spousesa

References

Geller  ACMiller  DRAnnas  GDDemierre  MFGilchrest  BAKoh  HK Melanoma incidence and mortality among US whites, 1968-1999. JAMA 2002;288 (14) 1719- 1720
PubMed Link to Article
Brady  MSOliveria  SAChristos  PJ  et al.  Patterns of detection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 2000;89 (2) 342- 347
PubMed Link to Article
Koh  HKMiller  DRGeller  ACClapp  RWMercer  MBLew  RA Who discovers melanoma? patterns from a population-based survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;26 (6) 914- 919
PubMed Link to Article
Robinson  JKRigel  DSAmonette  RA What promotes skin-self examination? J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38 (5, pt 1) 752- 757
PubMed Link to Article
Miller  DRGeller  ACWyatt  SW  et al.  Melanoma awareness and self-examination practices: results of a United States survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;34 (6) 962- 970
PubMed Link to Article
Geller  ACEmmons  KBrooks  DR  et al.  Skin cancer prevention and detection practices among siblings of patients with melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49 (4) 631- 638
PubMed Link to Article
Swetter  SMJohnson  TMMiller  DRLayton  CJBrooks  KRGeller  AC Melanoma in middle-aged and older men: a multi-institutional survey study of factors related to tumor thickness. Arch Dermatol 2009;145 (4) 397- 404
Melia  JHarland  CMoss  SEiser  JRPendry  L Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening study. Br J Cancer 2000;82 (9) 1605- 1609
PubMed Link to Article
Brandberg  YBolund  CMichelson  HMansson-Brahme  ERingborg  USjoden  PO Perceived susceptibility to and knowledge of malignant melanoma: screening participants vs the general population. Prev Med 1996;25 (2) 170- 177
PubMed Link to Article
Weinstock  MAMartin  RARisica  PM  et al.  Thorough skin examination for the early detection of melanoma. Am J Prev Med 1999;17 (3) 169- 175
PubMed Link to Article
Schwartz  JLWang  TSHamilton  TALowe  LSondak  VKJohnson  TM Thin primary cutaneous melanomas: associated detection patterns, lesion characteristics, and patient characteristics. Cancer 2002;95 (7) 1562- 1568
PubMed Link to Article
Robinson  JKTurrisi  RStapleton  BS Efficacy of a partner assistance intervention design to increase skin self-examination performance. Arch Dermatol 2007;143 (1) 37- 41
PubMed Link to Article
Robinson  JKStapleton  JTurrisi  R Relationship and partner moderator variables increase self-efficacy of performing skin self-examination. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58 (5) 755- 762
PubMed Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

824 Views
19 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Melanoma

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Make the Diagnosis: Melanoma