We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Evidence-Based Dermatology Section Welcomes a New Feature: Critically Appraised Topic

Michael Bigby, MD, Section Editor
Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(9):1185-1186. doi:10.1001/archderm.143.9.1185.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Since 1999, the Evidence-Based Dermatology (EBD) section has fulfilled its purpose of alerting clinicians to important advances in dermatology to help them use the best and most up-to date evidence when making decisions about patient care. My assistant editors and I select original articles from the biomedical literature to summarize in structured, value-added abstracts, and clinical experts comment on them. The procedures we follow as we attempt to achieve this purpose are (1) detecting, using prestated criteria, the best original and systematic review articles, which may or may not include meta-analysis, on the cause, course, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of disorders and quality of care or economics in dermatology; (2) introducing these articles with declarative titles and summarizing them accurately in structured abstracts that describe their objectives, methods, results, and evidence-based conclusions; (3) adding brief, highly expert commentaries to place each of these summaries in its proper clinical and health care context; and (4) disseminating the summaries to clinicians in a timely fashion.

Figures in this Article



Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview


Place holder to copy figure label and caption

Dr Bigby, section editor, and his dedicated assistant section editors.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

3 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles