We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence |

Western Blotting as the Confirmatory Test for Syphilis in a Patient With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Erika Gaines Levine, MD; Justin J. Green, MD; Warren R. Heymann, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(4):490-491. doi:10.1001/archderm.140.4.490.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We describe a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who developed a palmoplantar eruption and positive serologic findings consistent with secondary syphilis. Because of the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, patients with SLE can have both false-positive nontreponemal and treponemal-specific tests. Western blotting was used to confirm a positive diagnosis of syphilis in our patient. Western blotting is one of the most specific tests in determining whether a patient with SLE has syphilis.1 This case demonstrates the utility of the Western blot with respect to diagnosing syphilis in patients with autoimmune disease.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Discrete, grayish-pink, scaly, oval papules scattered over the flexor extremity.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

A, Histologic picture demonstrating an irregularly acanthotic epidermis with a lichenoid interface dermatitis (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100). B, Perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in the dermis with endovascular proliferation (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×400). No eosinophils or plasma cells are evident.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles