Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare and potentially aggressive cancer of the skin. Cumulative data from small retrospective series have supported treatment by wide excision and adjuvant radiotherapy. However, wide excision may be difficult to perform in patients with tumors of the head and neck or in older populations with comorbidities that may be incompatible with general anesthesia.
Nine patients (group 1) with stage I (without lymph node involvement) Merkel cell carcinoma primary tumors were treated in our center by radiotherapy alone. The rate of recurrence was compared between this group and 17 additional patients (group 2) with stage I Merkel cell carcinoma who received conventional treatment (surgery followed by radiotherapy).
The median follow-up was 3.0 years (range, 8 months to 7 years) for group 1 and 4.6 years (range, 5 months to 11 years) for group 2. During this period, we observed 1 relapse and 1 progression of disease in group 2. No statistical difference was found in overall and disease-free survival between the 2 groups of patients.
This study demonstrates the possibility of treating inoperable Merkel cell carcinoma by radiotherapy alone, with outcomes similar to those of classic treatment.
MERKEL CELL carcinoma (MCC), first described in 1972 by Toker,1 is a rare and highly malignant tumor of the skin. lt is believed to originate from the Merkel cell and comprises neuroendocrine cells in the basal layer of the epidermis. Merkel cell carcinoma most commonly arises in older white patients, with a mean age at diagnosis of 69 years.2,3 It usually appears as a painless, red, solitary nodule that has grown rapidly over a few weeks to months. At the first consultation, 70% to 80% of patients with MCC have localized disease (stage I), 10% to 30% have regional lymph node involvement (stage II), and 1% to 4% have distant metastases (stage III).2,3
Merkel cell carcinoma, once regarded as an indolent skin tumor, is considered an aggressive and often lethal malignancy, comparable to melanoma in its metastatic spread and mortality. The overall recurrence rate ranges from 55% to 79%, occurring most often locally or in regional lymph nodes within the first 6 to 12 months after initial diagnosis.2,4
Because of the rarity of the disease, no prospective study has assessed the management of this tumor. Cumulative data from small retrospective series have supported 2.0- to 3.0-cm-wide excision and adjuvant radiation treatment, using large fields to cover the entire surgical scar.2,5- 7 However, surgery is sometimes difficult because MCC is often found in older persons with health problems that may be incompatible with general anesthesia. Furthermore, the head and neck region is a frequent location of MCC (54% in our population), and a large excision is often difficult to perform in this topography.
Between March 1991 and November 2001, we treated in our center 9 patients with inoperable stage I MCC primary tumors by radiotherapy alone (group 1). The rate of recurrence was compared between this group and 17 patients with the same stage MCC but who received conventional treatment (surgery followed by radiotherapy) (group 2).
Among the patients with stage I MCC treated in our center between 1991 and 2001, 26 patients were selected who had been treated by radiotherapy alone or by conventional surgery followed by radiotherapy. There were 18 women (69%) and 8 men (31%), for a female-male ratio of 2.2:1. The mean age was 81 years (range, 49-94 years). The primary tumor was located in the head and neck area in 14 patients (54%) and in the extremities in 12 (46%). The histological diagnosis of MCC was established by immunohistochemical staining of skin biopsy specimens in all cases.
The mean diameter of the tumors was 3.7 cm (range, 1.0-8.0 cm) in group 1 and 2.1 cm (range, 1.0-3.5 cm) in group 2. The diameters of the tumors in the 2 groups were comparable, except for 2 patients in group 1 who had 7.0- and 8.0-cm-wide tumors. The stage I status of the patients in the study was established by physical examination, chest x-ray films, and ultrasound examination of the draining lymph nodes.
In group 2, excision with 0.1- to 3.0-cm-wide margins was performed. Margins were less than 1.0 cm in 8 patients, between 1.0 and less than 2.0 cm in 5 patients, and 2.0 cm or greater in 3 patients. Margins for 1 patient were not known (Table 1).
All 26 patients received radiotherapy on the primary tumor site, as the exclusive treatment in group 1 and as adjuvant treatment after surgery in group 2. In each case, large fields were used to cover the tumor site, with margins greater than 2.0 cm.
The median dose used was 6000 rad (60 Gy) (range, 5000-7800 rad [50-78 Gy]), with a standard regimen of 5 irradiations per week totaling 1000 rad (10 Gy) per week in both groups.
Recently, because of the poor prognosis of patients with MCC at stage II and the radiosensitivity of this tumor, prophylactic irradiation of the draining lymph nodes has been proposed. The efficacy of this treatment has not been evaluated in the literature.
We performed prophylactic irradiation of the draining lymph nodes in 21 patients. Three patients in group 1 and 2 in group 2 did not receive this treatment. Additional irradiation of the area between the primary tumor site and the draining lymph nodes was performed in 4 patients in group 1 and in 7 in group 2; the site in 10 of these patients was the head and neck region. This was not considered a treatment of in-transit metastases but a prophylactic irradiation of in-transit tumor cells.
The overall survival and disease-free survival were analyzed using the nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare the data, with the significance level fixed at P = .05.
Follow-up data were available in all 26 patients, with a median follow-up of 4 years (range, 5 months to 11 years) from the date of the first biopsy confirming the diagnosis. The median follow-up for group 1 was 3.0 years (range, 8 months to 7 years) and for group 2 was 4.6 years (range, 5 months to 11 years).
Among the entire population, 1 recurrence was observed, a precocious skin relapse 6 months after treatment distant from the primary tumor site in a patient in group 2. This skin relapse was treated by radiotherapy alone, and the patient is alive 5 years after treatment. In another group 2 patient, metastasis occurred after treatment of an MCC tumor that was 3.5 cm in diameter, with relapse around the surgical scar 3 weeks after treatment and resistance to irradiation. This patient died 5 months after the relapse as a result of metastasis.
During the follow-up, 7 patients died, 3 in group 1 and 4 in group 2. Heart failure was the cause of most of the deaths (6 patients); the patient in group 2 with metastasis was the sole death from the MCC.
In the comparison of overall survival and disease-free survival between the 2 groups of patients, no statistically significant difference was found (Figure 1).
Disease-specific, relapse-free Kaplan-Meier survival of the 2 groups of patients (P = .48, log-rank test).
Merkel cell carcinoma was initially described as an indolent skin tumor of low malignant potential. However, subsequent investigations revealed that the tumor often has an aggressive course.8 This tumor has traditionally been managed with surgery alone, and 2.0- to 3.0-cm margins have been generally recommended.9,10 However, Gillenwater et al11 recently reported no difference in outcome among 18 patients with margins less than 1.0 cm, 1.0 to 2.0 cm, or greater than 2.0 cm.
Several authors reported improved local control by using postoperative irradiation to the primary site.5,6 Recently, Boyer et al12 compared survival and recurrence rates between patients with MCC treated with Mohs surgery alone and those treated with Mohs surgery and adjuvant postoperative radiation and did not find a significant difference between the treatment groups. However, all of the recurrences were in the Mohs surgery–only group, 1 of them marginal and 3 of them in transit.
Radiotherapy has also been proposed in the prophylactic management of draining lymph nodes,2 but no study has evaluated the survival rates using this modality of treatment. The data presented herein support the use of radiotherapy in the management of MCC, as 21 patients in the cohort received this prophylactic treatment.
Merkel cell carcinoma affects the sun-exposed areas of the skin, with approximately 50% of all tumors occurring in the face and neck. In this region, wide excision is often difficult to obtain. Furthermore, the need for general anesthesia for wide excision often presents difficulties in older patients. In these situations, radiotherapy alone should be considered, as it produces similar results (Figure 2 and Table 1).
Results of Merkel cell carcinoma treated by radiotherapy alone (patient 5 in Table 1) before (A) and 5 months after (B) irradiation. This patient is alive 7 years after treatment.
Although no dose-response curve has been established for the treatment of MCC, most authors agree that doses of 4000 to 6000 rad (40-60 Gy) with standard fractionation are appropriate.5,6 In the present study, 6000 rad (60 Gy) was successfully used in both patient groups.
Other results of treating primary MCC by radiotherapy alone have been published in case reports,13,14 as Ott et al, who showed a prolonged remission in 4 patients with MCC of the head and neck, but the study did not evaluate the outcome of this treatment compared with standard treatment.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates the possibility of treating inoperable MCC by radiotherapy alone, with outcomes similar to those of classic treatment with surgery and radiotherapy.
Corresponding author and reprints: Laurent Mortier, MD, Clinique de Dermatologie, Hopital Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille, Rue Michel Polonovski, 59037 Lille CEDEX, France (e-mail: email@example.com).
Accepted for publication April 2, 2003.
Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature
Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Dermatology editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more
Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features
Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)
Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 47
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 3
All results at
and access these and other features:
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.