Editorial |

Cutaneous Photoprotection

John L. M. Hawk, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(4):527-530. doi:10.1001/archderm.139.4.527.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


THE STUDY highlighted in this issue of the ARCHIVES1 indicates yet again the great potential value of cutaneous sunscreen application, when undertaken conscientiously and carefully, against the now extremely well-documented ravages of sunlight in both the short and long term. This splendid randomized controlled trial is the continuation of a previous one showing sunscreen efficacy against the development of squamous cell carcinoma.2 It provides further evidence in a very large number of adults (1621 subjects aged 25-74 years), over a reasonably long time (2½ years), in a very ultraviolet (UV)-intense environment (Queensland, Australia), that frequent, liberal applications of high-protection sunscreen by ordinary people under normal circumstances is 25% more efficient against the development of potentially premalignant actinic keratoses than ad hoc applications. Less difference was seen over the subsequent and final 2 years of the study, arguably because of increased care in applying sunscreen regularly in the control group as the trial progressed. This is a great relief to us dermatologists because it proves that we are not advising our patients incorrectly; but it also clearly shows that participants in the control arm of the trial, who were using sunscreens just as most of us do, did not fare as well as their counterparts in the study group. So why not? Well, because sunscreens should be used in the context discussed below.


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 5

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...