0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Evidence-Based Dermatology: Review |

Accuracy of Computer Diagnosis of Melanoma A Quantitative Meta-analysis

Barbara Rosado, MD; Scott Menzies, MD; Alexandra Harbauer, MD; Hubert Pehamberger, MD; Klaus Wolff, MD; Michael Binder, MD; Harald Kittler, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(3):361-367. doi:10.1001/archderm.139.3.361.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background  Recent developments in computer technology have raised expectations that fully automated diagnostic instruments will become available to diagnose cutaneous melanoma without the need of human expertise.

Objectives  To critically review the contemporary literature on computer diagnosis of melanoma, evaluate the accuracy of such computer diagnosis, analyze the influence of study characteristics, and compare the accuracy of computer diagnosis of melanoma with human diagnosis.

Methods  Quantitative meta-analysis of published reports.

Data Sources  Eligible studies were identified by a MEDLINE search covering the period from January 1991 to March 2002, by manual searches of the reference lists of retrieved articles, and by direct communication with experts.

Results  Thirty studies with substantial differences in methodological quality were deemed eligible for meta-analysis. Five of these complied with the predetermined list of "good quality" requirements, but none met all methodological quality requirements. Ten of these studies compared the performance of computer diagnosis with human diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy achieved with computer diagnosis was statistically not different from that of human diagnosis (log odds ratios, 3.36 vs 3.51; P = .80). The diagnostic performance of the computer diagnosis was better for studies that used dermoscopic images than for studies that used clinical images (log odds ratios, 4.2 vs 3.4; P = .08). Other study characteristics did not significantly influence the accuracy of the computer diagnosis.

Conclusions  The computer diagnosis of melanoma is accurate under experimental conditions, but the practical value of automated diagnostic instruments under real-world conditions is currently unknown. We suggest minimum requirements for methodological quality in future experimental studies or, ideally, randomized controlled trials.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Summary receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, upper and lower confidence curves, and weighted summary ROC curve for the diagnostic accuracy of computer diagnosis of melanoma, with the inverse of the variance of each study used as a weighting factor.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Plot of diagnostic accuracy expressed as log odds ratio vs sample size of eligible studies of computer diagnosis of melanoma.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

186 Views
54 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();