We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Practice Gaps |

Need to Improve Skin Cancer Screening of High-Risk Patients Comment on “Skin Cancer Screening by Dermatologists, Family Practitioners, and Internists”

Amit Garg, MD; Alan Geller, MPH, RN
Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(1):44-45. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.385.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In their study, Oliveria et al reveal a practice gap in which more than 3 of 10 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 1 of 10 dermatologists report not screening more than half their high-risk patients for skin cancer. While a knowledge gap in identifying high-risk patients may be a contributing factor, time constraints, competing morbidities, and patient embarrassment/reluctance were cited as the strongest barriers to performing a full skin examination (FSE).

The continued existence of barriers to PCPs performing skin cancer screenings is not unexpected in the context of a shortage of PCPs coupled with a predicted health care overhaul that will provide first-time health care for millions of patients. To narrow this gap, dermatologists can train current and future PCPs to identify patients at the highest risk of advanced melanoma (white men older than 50 years) and devote more time to screening patients with multiple risk factors while limiting efforts toward low-risk patients. Although performing the FSE should remain within the province of PCPs and dermatologists, other specialists who see high-risk patients may improve early detection rates by integrating a focal skin examination into the specialty visit. For instance, the scenario in which the cardiologist, trained in the FSE during medical school and residency, examines the skin of the chest and back and finds an “ugly duckling” nevus while auscultating heart and lung sounds in a 65-year-old man with congestive heart failure is not unimaginable. The success of such an integrated examination requires that specialists make an additional effort to inspect the skin and be trained in recognizing and triaging suspicious lesions. After witnessing a short film (available upon request) illustrating the concept of the integrated skin examination, undifferentiated medical students perceived the integrated skin examination to take less time than initially thought, and they expressed strong intentions to incorporate the integrated skin examination into their routine visit regardless of specialty choice.1 This integrated approach underscores the importance of training medical students and residents to appreciate early on the relevance of the skin cancer screening and to recognize suspicious lesions. Currently, most graduating medical students fail to meet established American Association of Medical College guidelines for competency in dermatology. Improved competency in identifying skin cancer may be achieved through integrating novel experiential-based teaching strategies (ie, moulage) into core curricula and longitudinally integrating these with structured practical learning activities.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

3 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles