We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Practice Gaps |

Failure to Compare Dermoscopy Findings of Pigmented Lesions on Your Patient Comment on “Dermoscopy of Patients With Multiple Nevi”

Douglas Grossman, MD, PhD
Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(1):50. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.390.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Ideally, clinical tools used to detect melanoma discriminate between benign and malignant lesions allowing prompt excision of melanomas and minimal removal of benign nevi. For many clinicians, dermoscopy is used to view questionable lesions at one point in time, but this has reduced specificity since melanomas and nevi often share overlapping morphologic characteristics.1 Argenziano et al analyzed management of suspicious pigmented lesions in 2 contexts. First, a group of 6 dermatologists made recommendations regarding excision of 190 clinically atypical lesions based only on their examination of individual dermoscopic photographs. Second, the group was asked to reevaluate the same lesions alongside photographs of additional lesions from the same patients. Excision was recommended in 55% of cases in the first approach, but in only 14% of cases in the comparative approach. Although excision was recommended for the melanomas in both approaches, the comparative approach (assuming the remaining lesions were nevi) would be associated with far fewer benign nevi removals. Thus minding this “practice gap” through contextual dermoscopic analysis can limit unnecessary nevus removals that will benefit patients and reduce long-term costs of screening.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles