We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Practice Gaps |

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: One Procedure but Many Questions Comment on “Prognostic Usefulness of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients Who Have Clinically Node Negative, Localized, Primary Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma”

Sandra L. Wong, MD; Michael S. Sabel, MD; Timothy M. Johnson, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(4):415-416. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2011.53.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Since sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for cutaneous melanoma was developed nearly 20 years ago, there has been wide dissemination of the procedure in clinical practice, vastly changing the way patients are treated today. Although the initial Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial,1 an international randomized clinical trial, did not clearly demonstrate a survival advantage with SLNB, the results did support its role in providing important prognostic information and improving other outcomes (eg, melanoma-specific survival rates) in patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma. The ability to accurately stage patients and offer interventions to decrease risks of regional recurrence and/or increase relapse-free survival has led to the continued use of the procedure for these patients. Ultimately, these results formed the basis of Rhodes' analysis, and he similarly concludes that SLNB provides useful information for patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma. Despite strong scientific evidence supporting SLNB for intermediate-thickness melanoma, practice gaps exist. National practice patterns show considerable variation in the use of SLNB across the United States, indicating poor dissemination of evidence and/or slow physician uptake.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Make the Diagnosis: Melanoma