Anyone who has ever tried to scrape the foot of a crying and kicking infant will welcome the possibility of using simple packing tape instead of a scalpel to find mites. Given the problem of trying to find mites, eggs, or scybala, especially in children, many practitioners diagnose scabies clinically1,2 and treat even if neither mite nor products can be found.
The article by Walter et al3 in this issue of the Archives has the potential to substantially change the way we approach the diagnosis of scabies. It singles out the packing tape test as the most useful test for the diagnosis of scabies. It should be stressed that the evaluated test used packing tape and not office tape, which is not as strong. Packing tape was also used by Katsumata and Katsumata,4 who first described the test. In addition, the tape remains on the skin for a surprising 30 seconds, which may be time-consuming if many lesions are assessed. For the practitioner, the issue is not the strength of the tape but the strength of the evidence presented and the implications of this study for clinical practice. In clinical appraisal terms, are the results valid and important, and can they be applied to your setting?
Pretest and posttest probabilities of scabies illustrated with a Fagan nomogram.The pretest probability for both examples was 0.36. Example 1 (bold line): The positive likelihood ratio for dermoscopy was 1.52. If a patient's dermoscopy result were positive, then his or her posttest probability of scabies would be 0.46. Example 2 (gray line): The negative likelihood ratio for dermoscopy was 0.37. If a patient's dermoscopy results were negative, then his or her posttest probability of scabies would be 0.17.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Dermatology editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 4
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.