0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Observation |

Granulomatous Mycosis Fungoides and Granulomatous Slack Skin:  A Multicenter Study of the Cutaneous Lymphoma Histopathology Task Force Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) FREE

Werner Kempf, MD; Sonja Ostheeren-Michaelis, MD; Marco Paulli, MD; Marco Lucioni, MD; Janine Wechsler, MD; Heike Audring, MD; Chalid Assaf, MD; Thomas Rüdiger, MD; Rein Willemze, MD; Chris J. L. M. Meijer, MD; Emilio Berti, MD; Lorenzo Cerroni, MD; Marco Santucci, MD; Christian Hallermann, MD; Mark Berneburg, MD; Sergio Chimenti, MD; Alistair Robson, MBBS; Martà Marschalko, MD; Dmitry V. Kazakov, MD, PhD; Tony Petrella, MD; Sylvie Fraitag, MD; Agnes Carlotti, MD; Philippe Courville, MD; Hubert Laeng, MD; Robert Knobler, MD; Philippa Golling, MD; Reinhard Dummer, MD; Günter Burg, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland (Drs Kempf, Ostheeren-Michaelis, Golling, Dummer, and Burg), Hôpital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France (Dr Wechsler), Charité, Berlin, Germany (Drs Audring and Assaf), Leiden University, Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (Dr Willemze), University Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy (Dr Berti), Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (Dr Cerroni), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (Dr Berneburg), University of Rome, Rome, Italy (Dr Chimenti), Semmelweis Medical School, Budapest, Hungary (Dr Marschalko), Necker-Enfants Malades Hopital, Paris, France (Dr Fraitag), and Hopital Tarnier Cochin, Paris, France (Dr Carlotti); Departments of Pathology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy (Drs Paulli and Lucioni), Hôpital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France (Dr Wechsler), Luitpold Hospital, Würzburg, Germany (Dr Rüdiger), Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Dr Meijer), University Hospital, Djion, France (Drs Petrella and Courville), and Cantonal Hospital, Aarau, Switzerland (Dr Laeng); Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, University of Florence Medical School, Florence, Italy (Dr Santucci); Hautklinik Linden, Hannover, Germany (Dr Hallermann); Skin Tumour Unit, St John's Institute of Dermatology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, England (Dr Robson); Sikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic (Dr Kazakov); and Division of Special and Environmental Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Vienna, Austria (Dr Knobler).


Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(12):1609-1617. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2008.46.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

ABSTRACT

Background  Granulomatous cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are rare and represent a diagnostic challenge. Only limited data on the clinicopathological and prognostic features of granulomatous CTCLs are available. We studied 19 patients with granulomatous CTCLs to further characterize the clinicopathological, therapeutic, and prognostic features.

Observations  The group included 15 patients with granulomatous mycosis fungoides (GMF) and 4 with granulomatous slack skin (GSS) defined according to the World Health Organization–European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Patients with GMF and GSS displayed overlapping histologic features and differed only clinically by the development of bulky skin folds in GSS. Histologically, epidermotropism of lymphocytes was not a prominent feature and was absent in 9 of 19 cases (47%). Stable or progressive disease was observed in most patients despite various treatment modalities. Extracutaneous spread occurred in 5 of 19 patients (26%), second lymphoid neoplasms developed in 4 of 19 patients (21%), and 6 of 19 patients (32%) died of their disease. Disease-specific 5-year survival rate in GMF was 66%.

Conclusions  There are clinical differences between GMF and GSS, but they show overlapping histologic findings and therefore cannot be discriminated by histologic examination alone. Development of hanging skin folds is restricted to the intertriginous body regions. Granulomatous CTCLs show a therapy-resistant, slowly progressive course. The prognosis of GMF appears worse than that of classic nongranulomatous mycosis fungoides.

Figures in this Article

The occurrence of sarcoid-like granulomas is a well-known phenomenon in malignant lymphoma and is most commonly observed in patients with Hodgkin disease.1,2 In contrast, granulomatous features are rarely found in primary cutaneous lymphomas (CLs), with approximately 2% of all CLs displaying granulomatous features.3,4

Granuloma formation was reported in a broad variety of primary CLs,5,6 such as Sézary syndrome,7 primary cutaneous anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma,8 subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, and primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas.4 Granulomatous mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common form of granulomatous cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). In contrast, granulomatous slack skin (GSS) is a very rare form of CTCL, and to date only approximately 50 cases have been reported in the literature.9,10 In the World Health Organization–European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (WHO-EORTC) classification for cutaneous lymphomas, GSS is considered a distinct subtype of MF with characteristic clinical and histologic features.11,12

There have been only a limited number of studies on granulomatous CTCLs, particularly granulomatous MF (GMF). The clinicopathological features and the course of granulomatous CTCLs are still poorly characterized. The granuloma formation can be very extensive, so that the histologic diagnosis of lymphoma may be delayed, and the findings are often initially misdiagnosed as granulomatous dermatitis.4 There is controversy over whether the presence of granulomas in CLs correlates with a better prognosis.5,13 Thus, a multicenter study was conducted to analyze the clinical, histopathological, immunophenotypic, and genotypic features of granulomatous reactions in CTCLs, particularly GMF and GSS, as well as the course and prognosis of these granulomatous CTCLs.

METHODS

PATIENTS AND BIOPSIES

Twenty-three skin biopsy specimens from 23 patients with well-documented disease from a total of 18 European centers were submitted as “granulomatous CTCL” by the members of the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Histopathology Task Force. Cases to be included and further analyzed had to show prominent granuloma formation or numerous histiocytic giant cells or a histiocyte-rich infiltrate defined by histiocytes accounting for more than 25% of the entire infiltrate. The following clinical data were recorded: sex, age at diagnosis, biopsy site, clinical manifestation including location and distribution of skin lesions, TNM stage at diagnosis according to TNM classification of malignant tumors,14 age at first symptoms (if available), age at first biopsy specimen displaying granulomatous features, results of staging investigations, treatment, response to treatment, and outcome.

Inclusion criteria included hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical stainings of diagnostic quality, written detailed data or photographs of clinical presentation, and information on therapeutic interventions, as well as follow-up on course and outcome.

All biopsy specimens were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Hematoxylin-eosin staining as well as staining for elastic fibers was performed. Immunohistochemical staining for lymphocytic (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD30) and histiocytic (CD68) antigens was visualized by the streptavidin-biotin or alkaline phosphatase–anti–alkaline phosphatase method according to standard protocols. Rearrangement of T-cell receptor γ genes was assessed by polymerase chain reaction as previously described.15,16

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 15.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).

RESULTS

According to the WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas,11,12 19 cases of CTCL could be identified and classified as GMF (n = 15) or GSS (n = 4). Two cases originally submitted as GSS were reclassified as GMF because the skin lesions did not evolve to hanging skin folds during the follow-up period. Four additional cases were classified as primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified, and were excluded from further analysis because this study focused on GMF and GSS. In addition to the 23 cases of CTCL, 3 cases of secondary cutaneous involvement by systemic T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma— including 1 case of nodal Lennert lymphoma (as a variant of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma), 1 case of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and 1 case of nodal CD4+ T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma not otherwise specified—had been submitted but were excluded from this study because of their primary extracutaneous origin.

The clinical data, therapy, and outcome are presented in Table 1. Table 2 displays the histopathological, immunophenotypical, and genotypic features.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Clinical and Therapeutic Data From a Series of 19 Patients With Granulomatous Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Histologic, Immunophenotypic, and Genotypic Data From a Series of 19 Patients With Granulomatous Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas
GROUP 1: GMF
Clinical Features

This group consisted of 15 patients, 9 men and 6 women, resulting in a male to female ratio of 1.5:1. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years, with a broad range (20-72 years). In 2 patients, the disease had started in childhood before age 10 years. All patients in this group exhibited patches and plaques (Figure 1), some of them with atrophy of the skin but without cutis laxa–like features. In 1 patient, the disease was restricted to a solitary plaque representing unilesional MF. In 5 of 15 patients (33%), skin lesions were hyperpigmented (Figure 2). At the time of diagnosis, 13 of 15 (87%) were in stage I or II according to the TNM staging system.14 First symptoms of the disease had been reported to be present years or decades (median, 11 years; range, 1-15 years) before the diagnosis of GMF was established. Four patients had developed other types of lymphoid or myeloid neoplasms before or after the occurrence of GMF: Two patients had had nodal Hodgkin lymphoma, nodular sclerosing type, 20 years before and 4 years after the occurrence of GMF. In the third patient, nodal CD30+ anaplastic large-cell lymphoma developed 4 years before the diagnosis of GMF, and the fourth patient had had myeloid leukemia in childhood 21 years before the diagnosis of GMF. In all 4 patients, complete remission from nodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas or myeloid leukemia was observed.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing erythematous patches and plaques. Note that clinical features are not suggestive of granulomatous histologic findings.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing hyperpigmented patches.

Graphic Jump Location

Treatment of GMF was heterogeneous, involving combined treatment with psoralen–UV-A and interferon alfa in 7 patients. Three patients received chemotherapy with the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine sulfate, and prednisolone acetate), whereas 2 patients were treated with single-agent chemotherapy. Radiation was applied in 7 of 15 patients. Other treatment modalities included topical corticosteroids, imiquimod, and systemic retinoids. Complete tumor regression was observed in only 3 of 15 patients (20%), but recurrence developed within 2 years in 1 patient. In both patients with complete remission, the remission followed treatment with interferon alfa. Progression of the disease was observed in 6 of 15 patients (40%), and extracutaneous spread was observed in 5 (33%) with involvement of lymph nodes, liver, and bone marrow (Table 1). In 3 of 15 patients (20%), transformation into CD30+ large-cell phenotype was observed. Six of 15 patients (40%), including the 3 patients with transformation into a CD30+ large-cell phenotype, died of lymphoma after a median follow-up of 5.3 years (range, 1-20 years) after diagnosis and 16 years (range, 2-54 years) after onset of the disease, ie, the appearance of first symptoms. Disease-specific 5-year survival rate in GMF was 66%.

Histologic Features

The infiltrate was diffuse in 6 of 15 cases (40%), nodular in 4 (27%) (Figure 3), and perivascular or periadnexal in 5 (33%), and it extended throughout the entire dermis in 8 cases (53%) and into the subcutis in 5 (33%). Epidermotropism of lymphocytes was a prominent feature in only 4 cases (27%) and was subtle with only a few lymphocytes in another 4. In the remaining 7 biopsy specimens (47%), epidermotropism of lymphocytes could not be detected. The lymphocytic component of the infiltrate consisted of small lymphocytes without significant nuclear atypia in 4 cases (27%), whereas small lymphocytes with cerebriform nuclei were found in 5 (33%). In 6 cases (40%), tumor cells were small to medium-sized with pleomorphic nuclei, and in 1 of these cases large pleomorphic lymphocytes were intermingled with the predominant small to medium-sized tumor cells. Eosinophils were present and readily identifiable in 9 of 15 cases (60%) (Figure 4). Clusters of plasma cells, which were not related to overlying ulceration, were observed in 2 (13%) of the biopsy specimens. Granuloma formation with aggregations of histiocytes was found in 13 of 15 cases (87%), and multinucleated histiocytic giant cells were present in 8 biopsy specimens (53%) (Figure 4 and Figure 5). In all cases with granuloma formation, there was a sarcoid-like pattern of granulomas (Figure 4), whereas a granuloma annulare–like pattern could not be found in any of the specimens. Granulomas were absent in 2 specimens, but numerous multinucleated giant cells were scattered in a diffuse lymphocytic infiltrate in those 2 cases (Figure 6 and Figure 7). In 4 cases (27%), infiltration of dermal or subcutaneous vessels by lymphocytes was found and, in 2 of these 4 cases, numerous multinucleated giant cells were observed around and within the walls of large veins in the subcutis (Figure 8). Elastica staining was available in 12 cases. Loss of elastic fibers throughout the infiltrated areas was found in all 12 biopsy specimens, but elastophagocytosis was found in only 1 of 12 specimens (8%).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing dense nodular lymphocytic infiltrates throughout the entire dermis. Note the grenz zone and the absence of epidermotropism (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×25).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides. A, Infiltrate of small lymphocytes and granuloma formation (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×40). B, The lymphocytes exhibit nuclear atypia. Note admixed eosinophils (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×200).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing infiltrate with histiocytic multinucleated giant cells (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing diffuse lymphocytic infiltrate covering all dermal layers (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×25).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 7.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing scattered multinucleated giant cells and absence of granuloma formation (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×20). Inset, Note the scattered multinucleated giant cells with phagocytosis of small lymphocytes (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 8.

Infiltration of a large subcutaneous vein by the infiltrate containing multinucleated giant cells (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×20).

Graphic Jump Location
Immunophenotype and Genotype

The lymphocytes expressed a CD3+, CD4+, CD8 phenotype in 12 of 15 cases (80%). One of those cases showed expression of TIA-1 by CD4+ lymphocytes. Three cases (20%) exhibited a CD3+, CD4, CD8+ cytotoxic phenotype. Clonal rearrangement of T-cell receptor γ genes was detected by polymerase chain reaction in 13 (87%) of the biopsy specimens.

GROUP 2: GSS
Clinical Features

The GSS group included 2 men and 2 women. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years (range, 22-71 years). All 4 patients showed poikilodermatous patches and plaques in the intertriginous areas (axillae and groins) with the development of characteristic bulky skin folds (Figure 9). In 1 patient who had additional skin lesions on nonintertriginous areas of the trunk, only the lesions in the axillae and groin underwent cutis laxa–like changes, whereas skin lesions at other sites did not evolve in a similar way. All patients experienced an indolent, slowly progressive course without extracutaneous spread and were alive with disease after a median follow-up of 17 years. One patient developed a second lymphoid neoplasia (CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder of the skin) after the occurrence of GSS. Partial remission was achieved in 2 patients by psoralen–UV-A or topical carmustine. However, none of the other therapies, including surgical excision, topical corticosteroid, and mechlorethamine hydrochloride, or systemic therapies such as interferon alfa, in combination with retinoids, was effective, and in none of the patients was complete tumor regression observed. All patients were alive after a median follow-up of 17 years (range, 10-28 years), resulting in a 5-year survival rate of 100%.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 9.

Granulomatous slack skin showing bulky skin folds in the right axilla.

Graphic Jump Location
Histologic Features

Five biopsy specimens of the 4 patients were available for histologic evaluation. In 4 of the 5 specimens there was a diffuse lymphocytic infiltrate throughout the entire dermis and the upper parts of the subcutis with numerous scattered multinucleated giant cells displaying more than 10 nuclei per cell (Figure 10 and Figure 11). In addition, granuloma formation was identified in 1 of 4 cases. One biopsy specimen exhibited a lichenoid infiltrate of small to medium-sized lymphocytes mostly in the upper and mid-dermis with sarcoid-like granuloma and a few giant cells. This pattern was not related to initial disease manifestation because this biopsy specimen was obtained from established lesions with hanging skin folds. Epidermotropism of lymphocytes was present in only 1 case, but absent or very subtle with only a few scattered intraepidermal lymphocytes in the remaining 3 cases. The lymphocytes were small without nuclear atypia in 2 cases and small to medium-sized pleomorphic cells in the remaining 2 cases. Eosinophils could be found in all specimens, and mostly scattered plasma cells were present in 3 of 4 cases. In 2 cases, infiltration of large veins in the subcutis by multinucleated giant cells and lymphocytes was observed. Elastica staining demonstrated loss of elastic fibers in the infiltrated area in all cases. Elastophagocytosis was subtle and found in only 2 of 4 cases.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 10.

Granulomatous slack skin showing dense lymphocytic infiltrate throughout the entire dermis (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×25).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 11.

Granulomatous slack skin showing numerous multinucleated giant cells but lack of granuloma formation (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100).

Graphic Jump Location
Immunophenotype and Genotype

In 3 of 4 patients, lymphocytes displayed a CD3+ CD4+ CD8 phenotype. In contrast, 1 case showed a CD3+ CD4 CD8+ phenotype. Monoclonal rearrangement of T-cell receptor γ genes could be demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction in all cases. In addition, monoclonal rearrangement of T-cell receptor β genes was demonstrated by Southern blot technique in 1 of the cases.

COMMENT

In our series, GMF was the most common disorder, accounting for 79% of the analyzed cases. Patients affected by GMF and GSS were on average diagnosed in their fifth decade of life, with a male predominance in GMF. In both disorders, the disease extent and distribution of skin lesions at diagnosis corresponded to TNM stage Ia in the majority of patients (11 of 19 [58%]), with the trunk representing the predilection site (Figure 1). The clinical presentation of skin lesions in GMF was not indicative of the histologically detected granulomatous features (Figure 1). One-third of the patients with GMF manifested hyperpigmented skin lesions (Figure 2). Hyperpigmented MF has been reported as a common feature in CD8+ MF,17 but none of the cases with hyperpigmented skin lesions in our series displayed a CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell phenotype.

Psoralen–UV-A and/or interferon alfa in addition to radiotherapy were the most commonly used treatment modalities. Complete tumor regression could be achieved in only 3 of 15 patients (20%) with GMF. In half of the patients, the disease showed a slowly progressive course.

Extracutaneous spread was observed in a third of patients with GMF and was associated with transformation into CD30+ anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in 20% of the patients. Six of 15 patients (40%) with GMF, including the 3 patients with large-cell transformation, died of the disease. The percentage of patients with unfavorable outcome is identical to that in the study by Chen et al,13 who reported death due to the disease in 40% of patients with GMF. Whereas the occurrence of granulomas in MF has been considered to be associated with a favorable prognosis by some authors,6,18 other investigators could not confirm this observation.1921 These and our findings demonstrate that GMF is not associated with a better prognosis than classic, nongranulomatous MF. In fact, the 5-year survival rate of GMF (66%) is worse than that of classic MF and similar to that of folliculotropic MF.22,23

In contrast, all patients with GSS were still alive after a median follow-up of 17 years despite the fact that GSS was therapy resistant and complete remission could not be achieved in any of the patients. Recently, response of GSS to topical mechlorethamine was observed in 2 patients,24 but definitive therapy for GSS has yet to be established. Extracutaneous spread is exceedingly rare in GSS and did not occur in our series of patients with GSS.

Patients with GMF and GSS are known to be at risk for the development of second lymphoid neoplasias. In our series, 4 of 19 patients (21%) with GMF or GSS had experienced a second lymphoma before or after occurrence of granulomatous CTCLs, and an additional patient had had myeloid leukemia. This prevalence is lower than that reported in the literature, with 48% of the patients with GSS having second lymphoid neoplasias.10,25,26 These patients may be overrepresented in the literature because of the development of a second lymphoma and, eventually, misinterpretation of large-cell transformation as development of a second anaplastic large-cell lymphoma unrelated to GSS. Hodgkin lymphoma is the most common second neoplasia in patients with granulomatous CTCLs in the literature as well as in our series.10,25,26 The interval between lymphoid neoplasias and GMF or GSS may be years or even decades, as seen in 1 patient in our series who developed nodal Hodgkin lymphoma 20 years before onset of GMF. Thus, lifelong observation of patients with GMF and GSS is required.

Histologically, a diffuse infiltrate of lymphocytes extending throughout the entire dermis and the subcutis was the most common growth pattern (Figure 4). Granulomas were sarcoid-like in all biopsy specimens (Figure 6). Other patterns of granulomatous reactions, such as granuloma annulare–like, palisaded, or necrobiotic granuloma, as reported in the literature,2730 were not found in our series. In 70% of the CTCL cases, the infiltrates contained histiocytic giant cells displaying 10 or more nuclei (Figure 11). Remarkably, infiltration of the vessel walls of large veins by small lymphocytes and even by large multinucleated histiocytic giant cells was observed in a third of the cases (Figure 8). This is more common than reported in the literature.4,5 Epidermotropism of lymphocytes was previously reported as a common finding in granulomatous CTCLs and considered to be a useful histologic feature for discrimination of granulomatous CTCLs from reactive granulomatous disorders.5 In our series, however, epidermotropism was absent in almost half of the cases, limiting its value as a diagnostic marker in GMF and GSS. Although classic MF commonly displays epidermotropism, this histologic feature is not a prerequisite for MF according to the WHO-EORTC classification. Thus, lack of epidermotropism does not exclude the diagnosis of MF. In those cases, diagnosis of MF relies on the characteristic clinical presentation with patches and plaques.

Diagnosis in granulomatous CTCLs is often delayed, with a latency of years to decades after the onset of initial symptoms. Diagnosis is particularly challenging in cases with predominant granuloma formation in the absence of nuclear atypia or epidermotropism of tumor cells. Detection of a neoplastic T-cell clone, which was present in nearly all cases, may thus be a useful diagnostic adjunct in granulomatous CTCLs.

The histologic features of GSS have been reported as pathognomonic, with a diffuse lymphocytic infiltrate harboring numerous scattered multinucleated giant cells5,31 (Figures 6 and 7), but identical histologic features can also be observed in GMF.32 Remarkably, this pattern was also found in 2 of the 15 GMF cases in our series (Figures 6 and 7) and is therefore not pathognomonic for GSS. These observations demonstrate that GMF and GSS differ clinically but show overlapping histologic findings and therefore cannot be discriminated by histologic examination alone. It should be recalled that both diseases are considered variants of a single disease,33 which implies that GSS may be listed in future classifications for cutaneous lymphomas as another variant and not a subtype of MF. As emphasized by Scarabello and coworkers,4 diagnosis of GSS should rest on clinical grounds and be restricted to patients presenting clinically with characteristic bulky skin lesions.

The classic pathogenetic concept links the development of hanging skin folds in GSS to destruction of elastic fibers due to elastophagocytosis by histiocytic giant cells. However, loss of elastic fibers was found in all examined cases. The extent of loss of elastic fibers correlated with the extent of the granulomatous infiltrate but was not restricted to GSS. Moreover, only skin lesions in skin folds such as the axilla and the groin underwent cutis laxa–like changes, whereas skin lesions present at other body sites did not evolve in a similar way. These observations suggest that development of hanging skin folds is a location-related phenomenon and not solely the result of the destruction of elastic fibers. Hypothetically, the continuous stretching of elastic fibers in the intertriginous body areas during physiologic movements may facilitate the loss of their function when these regions become affected by lymphomatous infiltrates.

The pathogenetic mechanisms of granuloma formation in lymphoid neoplasms are poorly understood. Granulomatous reaction has been regarded by some authors as a local tissue response to the infiltrating malignant cells or their antigens,34 but this hypothesis has been criticized by others on the basis of the occurrence of granulomas in histologically lymphoma-free tissues.35 In addition, treatment with interferon alfa or bexarotene36 may induce sarcoid-like reactions. However, granuloma formation in our series was not related to previous therapy.

Recently, genetic alterations with t(3;9)(q12;p24) have been reported in a case of GSS,37 which may indicate genetic predisposition to granuloma formation. The pathogenetic processes underlying granuloma formation in granulomatous CTCLs remain to be elucidated.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Correspondence: Werner Kempf, MD, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Gloriastrasse 31, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland (kempf@derm.unizh.ch).

Accepted for Publication: February 19, 2008.

Author Contributions: All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Kempf, Burg, and Willemze. Acquisition of data: All authors. Analysis and interpretation of data: Kempf, Ostheeren-Michaelis, and Burg. Drafting of the manuscript: Kempf. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors. Statistical analysis: Kempf. Study supervision: Kempf, Burg, and Willemze.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Additional Contributions: We thank Beatrix Mueller for the excellent technical assistance.

REFERENCES

Sacks  ELDonaldson  SSGordon  JDorfman  RF Epithelioid granulomas associated with Hodgkin's disease: clinical correlations in 55 previously untreated patients. Cancer 1978;41 (2) 562- 567
PubMed Link to Article
Kadin  MEDonaldson  SSDorfman  RF Isolated granulomas in Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med 1970;283 (16) 859- 861
PubMed Link to Article
Shapiro  PEPinto  FJ The histologic spectrum of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (cutaneous T-cell lymphoma): a review of 222 biopsies, including newly described patterns and the earliest pathologic changes. Am J Surg Pathol 1994;18 (7) 645- 667
PubMed Link to Article
Scarabello  ALeinweber  BArdigó  M  et al.  Cutaneous lymphomas with prominent granulomatous reaction: a potential pitfall in the histopathologic diagnosis of cutaneous T- and B-cell lymphomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26 (10) 1259- 1268
PubMed Link to Article
LeBoit  PEZackheim  HSWhite  CJ Granulomatous variants of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: the histopathology of granulomatous mycosis fungoides and granulomatous slack skin. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12 (2) 83- 95
PubMed Link to Article
Ackerman  ABFlaxman  BA Granulomatous mycosis fungoides. Br J Dermatol 1970;82 (4) 397- 401
PubMed Link to Article
Carrozza  PMKempf  WKazakov  DVDummer  RBurg  G A case of Sézary's syndrome associated with granulomatous lesions, myelodysplastic syndrome and transformation into CD30-positive large-cell pleomorphic lymphoma. Br J Dermatol 2002;147 (3) 582- 586
PubMed Link to Article
Boulier  ICohen  JKerdel  FA Cutaneous large-cell lymphoma histologically resembling sarcoidosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;28 (2, pt 2) 327- 330
PubMed Link to Article
Balus  LManente  LRemotti  DGrammatico  PBellocci  M Granulomatous slack skin: report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol 1996;18 (2) 199- 206
PubMed Link to Article
Clarijs  MPoot  FLaka  APirard  CBourlond  A Granulomatous slack skin: treatment with extensive surgery and review of the literature. Dermatology 2003;206 (4) 393- 397
PubMed Link to Article
Willemze  RJaffe  ESBurg  G  et al.  WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood 2005;105 (10) 3768- 3785
PubMed Link to Article
Burg  GJaffe  ESKempf  W  et al.  WHO/EORTC classification of cutaneous lymphomas. LeBoit  PBurg  GWeedon  DSarasin  AWHO Books. Tumors of the Skin. Lyon, France: WHO IARC2005;
Chen  KRTanaka  MMiyakawa  S Granulomatous mycosis fungoides with small intestinal involvement and a fatal outcome. Br J Dermatol 1998;138 (3) 522- 525
PubMed Link to Article
International Union Against Cancer, TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 6th ed. New York, NY Wiley-Liss2002;
Whittaker  SJSmith  NPJones  RRLuzzatto  L Analysis of beta, gamma, and delta T-cell receptor genes in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Cancer 1991;68 (7) 1572- 1582
PubMed Link to Article
Wood  GSTung  RMHaeffner  AC  et al.  Detection of clonal T-cell receptor gamma gene rearrangements in early mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome by polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR/DGGE). J Invest Dermatol 1994;103 (1) 34- 41
PubMed Link to Article
Dummer  RKamarashev  JKempf  WHaffner  ACHess-Schmid  MBurg  G Junctional CD8+ cutaneous lymphomas with nonaggressive clinical behavior: a CD8+ variant of mycosis fungoides? Arch Dermatol 2002;138 (2) 199- 203
PubMed Link to Article
Schwartz  RABurgess  GHHoltermann  OA Mycosis fungoides associated with florid sarcoid reactions. J Surg Oncol 1980;14 (4) 347- 357
PubMed Link to Article
Schewach-Millet  MAzizi  ESemah  DBubis  JJChaitchuk  S Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma first presenting at the tumor stage: a clinicopathologic study. Int J Dermatol 1984;23 (4) 275- 278
PubMed Link to Article
Dabski  KStoll  HJ Granulomatous reactions in mycosis fungoides. J Surg Oncol 1987;34 (4) 217- 229
PubMed Link to Article
Papadavid  EYu  RCBunker  CScoones  DChu  AC Tumour progression in a patient with granulomatous mycosis fungoides. Br J Dermatol 1996;134 (4) 740- 743
PubMed Link to Article
Willemze  RKerl  HSterry  W  et al.  EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas: a proposal from the Cutaneous Lymphoma Study Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Blood 1997;90 (1) 354- 371
PubMed
Kim  YHLiu  HLMraz-Gernhard  SVarghese  AHoppe  RT Long-term outcome of 525 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: clinical prognostic factors and risk for disease progression. Arch Dermatol 2003;139 (7) 857- 866
PubMed Link to Article
Hultgren  TLJones  DDuvic  M Topical nitrogen mustard for the treatment of granulomatous slack skin. Am J Clin Dermatol 2007;8 (1) 51- 54
PubMed Link to Article
Noto  GPravata  GMiceli  SArico  M Granulomatous slack skin: report of a case associated with Hodgkin's disease and a review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 1994;131 (2) 275- 279
PubMed Link to Article
van Haselen  CWToonstra  Jvan der Putte  SJvan Dongen  JJvan Hees  CLvan Vloten  WA Granulomatous slack skin: report of three patients with an updated review of the literature. Dermatology 1998;196 (4) 382- 391
PubMed Link to Article
Barksdale  SKPerniciaro  CHalling  KCStrickler  JG Granuloma annulare in patients with malignant lymphoma: clinicopathologic study of thirteen new cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31 (1) 42- 48
PubMed Link to Article
Garrie  SAHirsch  PLevan  N Granuloma annulare–like pattern in mycosis fungoides. Arch Dermatol 1972;105 (5) 717- 719
PubMed Link to Article
Miyamoto  TMihara  M Subcutaneous granuloma annulare with Hodgkin's disease. J Dermatol 1996;23 (6) 405- 407
PubMed
Rongioletti  FCerroni  LMassone  CBasso  MCiambellotti  ARebora  A Different histologic patterns of cutaneous granulomas in systemic lymphoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51 (4) 600- 605
PubMed Link to Article
LeBoit  PE Granulomatous slack skin. Dermatol Clin 1994;12 (2) 375- 389
PubMed
Metzler  GSchlagenhauff  BKrober  SMKaiserling  ESchaumburg-Lever  GLischka  G Granulomatous mycosis fungoides: report of a case with some histopathologic features of granulomatous slack skin. Am J Dermatopathol 1999;21 (2) 156- 160
PubMed Link to Article
Topar  GZelger  BSchmuth  MRomani  NThaler  JSepp  N Granulomatous slack skin: a distinct disorder or a variant of mycosis fungoides? Acta Derm Venereol 2001;81 (1) 42- 44
PubMed Link to Article
Kahn  LBGordon  WCamp  R Florid sarcoid reaction associated with lymphoma of the skin. Cancer 1974;33 (4) 1117- 1122
PubMed Link to Article
Anderson  RGeraint James  DPeters  PMThomson  AD Local sarcoid-tissue reactions. Lancet 1962;1 (7241) 1211- 1213
PubMed Link to Article
Ruiz-de-Casas  ACarrizosa-Esquivel  AHerrera-Saval  ARios-Martín  JJCamacho  F Sézary syndrome associated with granulomatous lesions during treatment with bexarotene. Br J Dermatol 2006;154 (2) 372- 374
PubMed Link to Article
Ikonomou  IMAamot  HVHeim  SFossa  ADelabie  J Granulomatous slack skin with a translocation t(3;9)(q12;p24). Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31 (5) 803- 806
PubMed Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing erythematous patches and plaques. Note that clinical features are not suggestive of granulomatous histologic findings.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing hyperpigmented patches.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing dense nodular lymphocytic infiltrates throughout the entire dermis. Note the grenz zone and the absence of epidermotropism (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×25).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides. A, Infiltrate of small lymphocytes and granuloma formation (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×40). B, The lymphocytes exhibit nuclear atypia. Note admixed eosinophils (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×200).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing infiltrate with histiocytic multinucleated giant cells (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing diffuse lymphocytic infiltrate covering all dermal layers (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×25).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 7.

Granulomatous mycosis fungoides showing scattered multinucleated giant cells and absence of granuloma formation (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×20). Inset, Note the scattered multinucleated giant cells with phagocytosis of small lymphocytes (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 8.

Infiltration of a large subcutaneous vein by the infiltrate containing multinucleated giant cells (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×20).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 9.

Granulomatous slack skin showing bulky skin folds in the right axilla.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 10.

Granulomatous slack skin showing dense lymphocytic infiltrate throughout the entire dermis (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×25).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 11.

Granulomatous slack skin showing numerous multinucleated giant cells but lack of granuloma formation (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×100).

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Clinical and Therapeutic Data From a Series of 19 Patients With Granulomatous Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Histologic, Immunophenotypic, and Genotypic Data From a Series of 19 Patients With Granulomatous Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas

References

Sacks  ELDonaldson  SSGordon  JDorfman  RF Epithelioid granulomas associated with Hodgkin's disease: clinical correlations in 55 previously untreated patients. Cancer 1978;41 (2) 562- 567
PubMed Link to Article
Kadin  MEDonaldson  SSDorfman  RF Isolated granulomas in Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med 1970;283 (16) 859- 861
PubMed Link to Article
Shapiro  PEPinto  FJ The histologic spectrum of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (cutaneous T-cell lymphoma): a review of 222 biopsies, including newly described patterns and the earliest pathologic changes. Am J Surg Pathol 1994;18 (7) 645- 667
PubMed Link to Article
Scarabello  ALeinweber  BArdigó  M  et al.  Cutaneous lymphomas with prominent granulomatous reaction: a potential pitfall in the histopathologic diagnosis of cutaneous T- and B-cell lymphomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26 (10) 1259- 1268
PubMed Link to Article
LeBoit  PEZackheim  HSWhite  CJ Granulomatous variants of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: the histopathology of granulomatous mycosis fungoides and granulomatous slack skin. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12 (2) 83- 95
PubMed Link to Article
Ackerman  ABFlaxman  BA Granulomatous mycosis fungoides. Br J Dermatol 1970;82 (4) 397- 401
PubMed Link to Article
Carrozza  PMKempf  WKazakov  DVDummer  RBurg  G A case of Sézary's syndrome associated with granulomatous lesions, myelodysplastic syndrome and transformation into CD30-positive large-cell pleomorphic lymphoma. Br J Dermatol 2002;147 (3) 582- 586
PubMed Link to Article
Boulier  ICohen  JKerdel  FA Cutaneous large-cell lymphoma histologically resembling sarcoidosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993;28 (2, pt 2) 327- 330
PubMed Link to Article
Balus  LManente  LRemotti  DGrammatico  PBellocci  M Granulomatous slack skin: report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol 1996;18 (2) 199- 206
PubMed Link to Article
Clarijs  MPoot  FLaka  APirard  CBourlond  A Granulomatous slack skin: treatment with extensive surgery and review of the literature. Dermatology 2003;206 (4) 393- 397
PubMed Link to Article
Willemze  RJaffe  ESBurg  G  et al.  WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood 2005;105 (10) 3768- 3785
PubMed Link to Article
Burg  GJaffe  ESKempf  W  et al.  WHO/EORTC classification of cutaneous lymphomas. LeBoit  PBurg  GWeedon  DSarasin  AWHO Books. Tumors of the Skin. Lyon, France: WHO IARC2005;
Chen  KRTanaka  MMiyakawa  S Granulomatous mycosis fungoides with small intestinal involvement and a fatal outcome. Br J Dermatol 1998;138 (3) 522- 525
PubMed Link to Article
International Union Against Cancer, TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 6th ed. New York, NY Wiley-Liss2002;
Whittaker  SJSmith  NPJones  RRLuzzatto  L Analysis of beta, gamma, and delta T-cell receptor genes in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Cancer 1991;68 (7) 1572- 1582
PubMed Link to Article
Wood  GSTung  RMHaeffner  AC  et al.  Detection of clonal T-cell receptor gamma gene rearrangements in early mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome by polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR/DGGE). J Invest Dermatol 1994;103 (1) 34- 41
PubMed Link to Article
Dummer  RKamarashev  JKempf  WHaffner  ACHess-Schmid  MBurg  G Junctional CD8+ cutaneous lymphomas with nonaggressive clinical behavior: a CD8+ variant of mycosis fungoides? Arch Dermatol 2002;138 (2) 199- 203
PubMed Link to Article
Schwartz  RABurgess  GHHoltermann  OA Mycosis fungoides associated with florid sarcoid reactions. J Surg Oncol 1980;14 (4) 347- 357
PubMed Link to Article
Schewach-Millet  MAzizi  ESemah  DBubis  JJChaitchuk  S Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma first presenting at the tumor stage: a clinicopathologic study. Int J Dermatol 1984;23 (4) 275- 278
PubMed Link to Article
Dabski  KStoll  HJ Granulomatous reactions in mycosis fungoides. J Surg Oncol 1987;34 (4) 217- 229
PubMed Link to Article
Papadavid  EYu  RCBunker  CScoones  DChu  AC Tumour progression in a patient with granulomatous mycosis fungoides. Br J Dermatol 1996;134 (4) 740- 743
PubMed Link to Article
Willemze  RKerl  HSterry  W  et al.  EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas: a proposal from the Cutaneous Lymphoma Study Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Blood 1997;90 (1) 354- 371
PubMed
Kim  YHLiu  HLMraz-Gernhard  SVarghese  AHoppe  RT Long-term outcome of 525 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: clinical prognostic factors and risk for disease progression. Arch Dermatol 2003;139 (7) 857- 866
PubMed Link to Article
Hultgren  TLJones  DDuvic  M Topical nitrogen mustard for the treatment of granulomatous slack skin. Am J Clin Dermatol 2007;8 (1) 51- 54
PubMed Link to Article
Noto  GPravata  GMiceli  SArico  M Granulomatous slack skin: report of a case associated with Hodgkin's disease and a review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 1994;131 (2) 275- 279
PubMed Link to Article
van Haselen  CWToonstra  Jvan der Putte  SJvan Dongen  JJvan Hees  CLvan Vloten  WA Granulomatous slack skin: report of three patients with an updated review of the literature. Dermatology 1998;196 (4) 382- 391
PubMed Link to Article
Barksdale  SKPerniciaro  CHalling  KCStrickler  JG Granuloma annulare in patients with malignant lymphoma: clinicopathologic study of thirteen new cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31 (1) 42- 48
PubMed Link to Article
Garrie  SAHirsch  PLevan  N Granuloma annulare–like pattern in mycosis fungoides. Arch Dermatol 1972;105 (5) 717- 719
PubMed Link to Article
Miyamoto  TMihara  M Subcutaneous granuloma annulare with Hodgkin's disease. J Dermatol 1996;23 (6) 405- 407
PubMed
Rongioletti  FCerroni  LMassone  CBasso  MCiambellotti  ARebora  A Different histologic patterns of cutaneous granulomas in systemic lymphoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51 (4) 600- 605
PubMed Link to Article
LeBoit  PE Granulomatous slack skin. Dermatol Clin 1994;12 (2) 375- 389
PubMed
Metzler  GSchlagenhauff  BKrober  SMKaiserling  ESchaumburg-Lever  GLischka  G Granulomatous mycosis fungoides: report of a case with some histopathologic features of granulomatous slack skin. Am J Dermatopathol 1999;21 (2) 156- 160
PubMed Link to Article
Topar  GZelger  BSchmuth  MRomani  NThaler  JSepp  N Granulomatous slack skin: a distinct disorder or a variant of mycosis fungoides? Acta Derm Venereol 2001;81 (1) 42- 44
PubMed Link to Article
Kahn  LBGordon  WCamp  R Florid sarcoid reaction associated with lymphoma of the skin. Cancer 1974;33 (4) 1117- 1122
PubMed Link to Article
Anderson  RGeraint James  DPeters  PMThomson  AD Local sarcoid-tissue reactions. Lancet 1962;1 (7241) 1211- 1213
PubMed Link to Article
Ruiz-de-Casas  ACarrizosa-Esquivel  AHerrera-Saval  ARios-Martín  JJCamacho  F Sézary syndrome associated with granulomatous lesions during treatment with bexarotene. Br J Dermatol 2006;154 (2) 372- 374
PubMed Link to Article
Ikonomou  IMAamot  HVHeim  SFossa  ADelabie  J Granulomatous slack skin with a translocation t(3;9)(q12;p24). Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31 (5) 803- 806
PubMed Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 41

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections