Editorial |

Not All Tanners Are Created Equal:  Implications of Tanning Subtypes for Skin Cancer Prevention

Sherry L. Pagoto, PhD; Joel Hillhouse, PhD
Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(11):1505-1508. doi:10.1001/archderm.144.11.1505.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Recently, the idea that UV risk behaviors can be characterized by subtypes defined by specific behavioral patterns has emerged in the skin cancer literature.1,2 Further support is provided by O’Riordan et al3 in this issue of the Archives. They used latent class analyses to classify visitors to a Hawaiian beach into subtypes based on their degree of skin cancer risk, sun protection practices, and tanning motivations. The findings of this latest study parallel the study by Pagoto et al2 of visitors to Lake Michigan beaches in Chicago, Illinois. In this study, 4 subtypes of beachgoers were identified, 3 of which were strikingly similar to the ones described by O’Riordan et al3: (1) low-risk sun worshippers, (2) moderate-risk sun worshippers (tan seekers), and (3) high-risk individuals who sunburn easily (“sunburners”). The largest subtype in both of these studies included individuals with a strong desire to tan despite having a skin type that is conducive to sunburning. These individuals perceive themselves as at risk for skin cancer and use sunscreen but do not seek shade or wear protective clothing. This group is of greatest concern to physicians because their motivation to tan seems to override their perceived and actual risk for skin cancer.2 Overall, more than two-thirds of individuals in both beach samples reported that they were at the beach with the intention of tanning to improve their appearance.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles