0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Observation |

CHILD Syndrome in 3 Generations:  The Importance of Mild or Minimal Skin Lesions FREE

Mario Bittar, MD; Rudolf Happle, MD; Karl-Heinz Grzeschik, PhD; Leonora Leveleki, PhD; Michael Hertl, MD; Dorothea Bornholdt; Arne König, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology (Drs Bittar, Happle, Hertl, and König) and Center of Human Genetics (Drs Grzeschik and Leveleki and Ms Bornholdt), University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; and Department of Dermatology, National University of Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina (Dr Bittar).


Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(3):348-351. doi:10.1001/archderm.142.3.348.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

ABSTRACT

Background  CHILD syndrome (congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform nevus and limb defects, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man 308050) is an X-linked dominant trait with lethality for male embryos. The disorder is caused by mutations in NSDHL (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man 300275), a gene playing an important role in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway. Most reports deal with sporadic cases, and only 5 cases of mother-to-daughter transmission have been documented. We present here a family with mild features of CHILD syndrome in 3 generations. Molecular analysis was used to confirm the diagnosis.

Observations  We studied 14 members of a family with CHILD syndrome. The 23-year-old proposita, her mother, 2 aunts, and her grandmother presented with mild or minimal skin lesions that had been present since infancy. Analysis of the NSDHL gene showed missense mutation c.370G→A in these 5 patients. This mutation was absent in the 9 clinically unaffected family members tested.

Conclusions  In this family, we recognized CHILD syndrome with mild or minimal features in 3 generations because we were able to verify our clinical diagnosis by means of molecular analysis. We assume that many cases that so far have been considered sporadic may in fact be familial when a meticulous physical examination of female family members is combined with molecular testing.

Figures in this Article

The term CHILD syndrome is an acronym that denotes congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform nevus and limb defects.1,2 It is an X-linked dominant trait with lethality for male embryos (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man 308050). The underlying mutations of the NSDHL gene (NAD[P]H steroid dehydrogenase–like protein) at Xq28 (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man 300275) involve the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway.3 Characteristic clinical features are a peculiar inflammatory skin disorder called CHILD nevus,4 which has a unique lateralization pattern5 with strict midline demarcation and ptychotropism (affinity to body folds).2 Associated ipsilateral extracutaneous defects in the form of hypoplasia or aplasia may involve the limbs and other skeletal structures, as well as the viscera, such as lung, heart,6 and kidney.1

About 60 cases have been reported so far. Most authors described sporadic cases demonstrating typical clinical features, with some atypical manifestations. Only 5 cases of mother-to-daughter transmission were documented.711 We present here a family with mildly affected members in 3 generations. We emphasize the importance of molecular analysis to confirm the diagnosis in cases with atypical or minimal involvement.

REPORT OF CASES

A pedigree of this family is shown in Figure 1.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Pedigree of a family with CHILD syndrome (congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform nevus and limb defects) in 3 generations. Squares indicate male members; circles, female members; squares and circles surrounded by a square or circle, individuals in whom NSDHL analysis was performed; unshaded squares and circles, members of the family without clinical findings; shaded circles surrounded by a circle, patients with NSDHL missense mutation c.370G→A; diamonds, miscarriages; slashes, dead; and arrow, the proposita (case 1).

Graphic Jump Location
CASE 1

The 23-year-old proposita presented with inflammatory skin lesions involving several areas on the left side of her body. The cutaneous changes had been noted first at the age of 1 year. The findings from the physical examination showed lesions of CHILD nevus in the vulvar region with lateralization, ptychotropism, and hypertrophy of the ipsilateral labium majus (Figure 2). Both hands had multiple periungual hyperkeratoses with fissuring, with onychodystrophy of the left index finger (Figure 3). On both fifth toes, linear hyperkeratoses with brownish scaling were noted. Both big toes showed onychodystrophy. Moreover, the patient had bilateral plantar hyperkeratotic plaques with fissuring. The left side of her body, including the face, hands, and feet, wassomewhat smaller than the right side. The short left leg resulted in mild scoliosis.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

CHILD (congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform nevus and limb defects) nevus showing lateralization, ptychotropism, and hypertrophy of the left labium majus in case 1.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Periungual hyperkeratosis with fissuring and onychodystrophy of the left index finger in case 1.

Graphic Jump Location
CASE 2

The 47-year-old mother of the proposita also had 1 healthy son. She had had 2 miscarriages. She had recognized a linear erythematous lesion with scaling on her right middle finger approximately 30 years previously. The lesion had shown some waxing and waning. At physical examination, dystrophy of the corresponding nail was noted (Figure 4). No other abnormalities were found.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Small linear area of erythema and hyperkeratosis involving the right middle finger with asymmetry of the corresponding nail fold in case 2.

Graphic Jump Location
CASE 3

The 53-year-old aunt of the proposita had a healthy daughter. The aunt had had 1 miscarriage. She had aplasia of the distal phalanx of the left fifth toe with pronounced onychodystrophy. No other abnormality was noted.

CASE 4

The 62-year-old aunt of the proposita had asymptomatic longitudinal onychodystrophy of her left index finger present since childhood. She had 1 healthy son and 2 healthy daughters. No other pathological features were noted.

CASE 5

The 82-year-old grandmother of the proposita was not available for physical examination, but the family reported that since childhood she had had a linear hyperkeratotic lesion of her left fifth toe, similar to the lesions in her granddaughter (case 1).

RESULTS

After having obtained informed consent, we took blood samples for DNA analysis from the 5 described individuals and from 9 clinically unaffected family members as shown in Figure 1. The molecular findings obtained in case 1 have been published previously in a mutation report.11 Initial single-strand conformation analysis in case 1 did not show any NSDHL mutation, but DNA sequence analysis showed missense mutation c.370G→A in exon 4, which was confirmed by means of amplification refractory mutation system testing (Figure 5). This mutation that represents an amino acid change from glycine to serine, G124S, was likewise present in the 4 other cases as described. No NSDHL mutation was found in the 9 clinically unaffected family members tested. Moreover, the G124S mutation was undetectable in 100 healthy control subjects.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Missense mutation c.370G→A in exon 4 of the NSDHL gene. A, Amplification refractory mutation system testing shows the polymerase chain reaction products in case 1 compared with DNA from a control subject (wild type). B, Sequence of polymerase chain reaction products in case 1 from exon 4 compared with DNA from a control subject.

Graphic Jump Location

COMMENT

In this family, CHILD syndrome was diagnosed in 3 generations. Remarkably, 4 of the 5 affected women had such mild involvement that a definite diagnosis would have been impossible without molecular confirmation. For example, a small linear inflammatory lesion with some onychodystrophy of 1 finger was noted in case 2. From a clinician's point of view, this sign would not have been sufficient to establish a definite diagnosis of CHILD syndrome. Hence, we are now able to expand the clinical spectrum of CHILD syndrome by including cases of atypical or minimal involvement.

The clinical diagnosis as established in the proposita enabled us to recognize 4 other family members with CHILD syndrome by means of a combined clinical and molecular examination. The mild manifestations in these 4 additional cases may be explained by extreme lyonization occurring at random.

Genetically induced skewing of X inactivation is another possible explanation. Studies of sister-sister correlation in healthy families have shown that preferential inactivation of a given X chromosome may be determined genetically by a locus on the long arm (Xq25-q26) and by a locus in the region of the X-inactivation center.12 Moreover, analysis of X-inactivation profiles in monozygotic vs dizygotic healthy twin pairs have likewise revealed a strong genetic component to nonrandom X inactivation.13 These studies allow the hypothesis that a genetic factor controlled by the X chromosome carrying the NSDHL mutation may have led to preferential inactivation of this X chromosome, which led to a mild phenotype in various female gene carriers in this family.

A third, albeit rather hypothetical, explanation would be a particular genotype-phenotype correlation. The missense mutation G124S as described in this family has not yet been described in any other case. Accordingly, one might hypothesize that this mutation generally is associated with a mild phenotype as observed in several members of this family. So far, however, the amount of molecular data obtained in patients with CHILD syndrome does not allow us to draw any conclusion regarding a genotype-phenotype correlation. On the contrary, the cohort examined by our group11 provides evidence that a genotype-phenotype correlation is unlikely in CHILD syndrome because we were able to demonstrate that, considering phenotypic involvement, point mutations are as fatal as partial or even complete deletion of the NSDHL gene. For the time being, we propose that the phenotypic variety in female carriers of NSDHL defects is caused by the more or less random effect of X inactivation rather than by specific effects of a given type of mutation.

Remarkably, gene carriers with mild or minimal involvement have been described in families with 1 severely affected member—for example, the mother of a girl with full-blown CHILD syndrome had some minor linear lesions on her hand.8 In another family, the sister of a severely affected patient had bilateral minor lesions of CHILD nevus mainly on her fingers and toes without any associated extracutaneous defect.7 These examples, as well as the present family, show clearly that an NSDHL mutation may lead to a multisystem birth defect in the form of classic CHILD syndrome or to mild involvement that can be overlooked easily. Therefore, a thorough examination of female family members, especially of the mother, is mandatory before establishing a diagnosis of sporadic CHILD syndrome.

For the practical purpose of genetic counseling, a combined clinical and molecular examination will help in recognizing individuals with only mild or minimal features of CHILD syndrome. Hence, cases that have so far been considered sporadic may be revisited in the light of present knowledge. Apart from cases with minimal involvement, it is likewise important to remember that cases with atypical manifestations such as bilateral, almost symmetrical distribution of CHILD nevus have been confirmed at the molecular level.14 These examples impressively demonstrate the broad range of clinical manifestations of CHILD syndrome.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Correspondence: Mario Bittar, MD, Department of Dermatology, National University of Cuyo, Jujuy 134 Apt 1, M5500DDD, Mendoza, Argentina (mariobittar@web.de).

Financial Disclosure: None.

Accepted for Publication: June 9, 2005.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Bittar, Happle, and König. Acquisition of data: Bittar, Leveleki, and Bornholdt. Analysis and interpretation of data: Bittar, Happle, Grzeschik, Leveleki, Bornholdt, and König. Drafting of the manuscript: Bittar and Happle. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Happle, Grzeschik, Hertl, and König. Obtained funding:Happle, Grzeschik and König. Administrative, technical, and material support: Happle, Grzeschik, Hertl, and König. Study supervision: Happle, Grzeschik, and König.

REFERENCES

Happle  RKoch  HLenz  W The CHILD syndrome: congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform erythroderma and limb defects. Eur J Pediatr 1980;13427- 33
PubMed Link to Article
Happle  R Ptychotropism as a cutaneous feature of the CHILD syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23 ((4 pt 1)) 763- 766
PubMed Link to Article
König  AHapple  RBornholdt  DEngel  HGrzeschik  KH Mutations in the NSDHL gene, encoding a 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, cause CHILD syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2000;90339- 346
PubMed Link to Article
Happle  RMittag  HKüster  W The CHILD nevus: a distinct skin disorder. Dermatology 1995;191210- 216
PubMed Link to Article
Happle  R Mosaicism in human skin: understanding the patterns and mechanisms. Arch Dermatol 1993;1291460- 1470
PubMed Link to Article
Hebert  AAEsterly  NBHolbrook  KAHall  JC The CHILD syndrome: histologic and ultrastructural studies. Arch Dermatol 1987;123503- 509
PubMed Link to Article
Baptista  APCortesâo  JM Inflammatory variable epidermal naevus (atypical I.L.V.E.N.? a new entity?) [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1979;106443- 450
PubMed
Happle  RKarlic  DSteijlen  PM CHILD syndrome in a mother and daughter [in German]. Hautarzt 1990;41105- 108
PubMed
Schlenzka  KGehre  MNeumann  HJSochor  H CHILD syndrome: a case report for understanding this rare genetic dermatosis [in German]. Dermatol Monatsschr 1989;175100- 106
PubMed
Kontras  SBKataria  APEaton  AP  et al.  Congenital unilateral ichthyosiform erythroderma with ipsilateral hypoplasia of upper and lower limbs. Birth Defects 1975;11333- 334
Bornholdt  DKönig  AHapple  R  et al.  Mutational spectrum of NSDHL in CHILD syndrome. J Med Genet 2005;42e17Available at:http://jmg.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/42/2/e17
Link to Article
Naumova  AKOlien  LBird  LM  et al.  Genetic mapping of X-linked loci involved in skewing of X chromosome inactivation in the human. Eur J Hum Genet 1998;6552- 562
PubMed Link to Article
Vickers  MAMcLeod  ESpector  TDWilson  IJ Assessment of mechanism of acquired skewed X inactivation by analysis of twins. Blood 2001;971274- 1281
PubMed Link to Article
König  AHapple  RFink-Puches  R  et al.  A novel missense mutation of NSDHL in an unusual case of CHILD syndrome showing bilateral, almost symmetric involvement. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46594- 596
PubMed Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Pedigree of a family with CHILD syndrome (congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform nevus and limb defects) in 3 generations. Squares indicate male members; circles, female members; squares and circles surrounded by a square or circle, individuals in whom NSDHL analysis was performed; unshaded squares and circles, members of the family without clinical findings; shaded circles surrounded by a circle, patients with NSDHL missense mutation c.370G→A; diamonds, miscarriages; slashes, dead; and arrow, the proposita (case 1).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

CHILD (congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform nevus and limb defects) nevus showing lateralization, ptychotropism, and hypertrophy of the left labium majus in case 1.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Periungual hyperkeratosis with fissuring and onychodystrophy of the left index finger in case 1.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Small linear area of erythema and hyperkeratosis involving the right middle finger with asymmetry of the corresponding nail fold in case 2.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Missense mutation c.370G→A in exon 4 of the NSDHL gene. A, Amplification refractory mutation system testing shows the polymerase chain reaction products in case 1 compared with DNA from a control subject (wild type). B, Sequence of polymerase chain reaction products in case 1 from exon 4 compared with DNA from a control subject.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Happle  RKoch  HLenz  W The CHILD syndrome: congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform erythroderma and limb defects. Eur J Pediatr 1980;13427- 33
PubMed Link to Article
Happle  R Ptychotropism as a cutaneous feature of the CHILD syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23 ((4 pt 1)) 763- 766
PubMed Link to Article
König  AHapple  RBornholdt  DEngel  HGrzeschik  KH Mutations in the NSDHL gene, encoding a 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, cause CHILD syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2000;90339- 346
PubMed Link to Article
Happle  RMittag  HKüster  W The CHILD nevus: a distinct skin disorder. Dermatology 1995;191210- 216
PubMed Link to Article
Happle  R Mosaicism in human skin: understanding the patterns and mechanisms. Arch Dermatol 1993;1291460- 1470
PubMed Link to Article
Hebert  AAEsterly  NBHolbrook  KAHall  JC The CHILD syndrome: histologic and ultrastructural studies. Arch Dermatol 1987;123503- 509
PubMed Link to Article
Baptista  APCortesâo  JM Inflammatory variable epidermal naevus (atypical I.L.V.E.N.? a new entity?) [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1979;106443- 450
PubMed
Happle  RKarlic  DSteijlen  PM CHILD syndrome in a mother and daughter [in German]. Hautarzt 1990;41105- 108
PubMed
Schlenzka  KGehre  MNeumann  HJSochor  H CHILD syndrome: a case report for understanding this rare genetic dermatosis [in German]. Dermatol Monatsschr 1989;175100- 106
PubMed
Kontras  SBKataria  APEaton  AP  et al.  Congenital unilateral ichthyosiform erythroderma with ipsilateral hypoplasia of upper and lower limbs. Birth Defects 1975;11333- 334
Bornholdt  DKönig  AHapple  R  et al.  Mutational spectrum of NSDHL in CHILD syndrome. J Med Genet 2005;42e17Available at:http://jmg.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/42/2/e17
Link to Article
Naumova  AKOlien  LBird  LM  et al.  Genetic mapping of X-linked loci involved in skewing of X chromosome inactivation in the human. Eur J Hum Genet 1998;6552- 562
PubMed Link to Article
Vickers  MAMcLeod  ESpector  TDWilson  IJ Assessment of mechanism of acquired skewed X inactivation by analysis of twins. Blood 2001;971274- 1281
PubMed Link to Article
König  AHapple  RFink-Puches  R  et al.  A novel missense mutation of NSDHL in an unusual case of CHILD syndrome showing bilateral, almost symmetric involvement. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46594- 596
PubMed Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 14

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.