We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of JAMA Dermatology |

Highlights FREE

JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(8):861. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3275.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Medical research relies on continuous funding support. Although there are many funding sources, National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards remain the benchmark. In this retrospective study of NIH grants awarded to departments of dermatology, Cheng et al demonstrate a downward trend in NIH funding for female and MD-only dermatology investigators. Further research is needed to clarify the nature of these funding disparities, but this growing inequality of opportunity for women and MD physician-scientists in dermatology research suggests the importance of departmental support and junior faculty mentorship for women and MD investigators.

Many primary and secondary prevention interventions for skin cancer are best targeted to individuals classified as being at increased risk of melanoma. Most published risk-prevention models have limited reporting of methods and results, and few have been externally validated. In this Australian population-based case-control-family study, Vuong et al report a new melanoma risk-prediction model that includes self-assessed variables: hair color, nevus density, first-degree family history of melanoma, previous nonmelanoma skin cancer, and tanning bed use. This model demonstrated good discrimination and calibration and performed satisfactorily on external validation.

Anti-p200 pemphigoid is a rare subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease characterized by autoantibodies directed against a 200-kDa protein in the lower lamina lucida of the basement membrane zone. Anti-p200 pemphigoid is likely often misdiagnosed as bullous pemphigoid or epidermolysis bullosa acquisita because of the low availability of diagnostic assays and expertise. In this retrospective study, Meijer et al describe the use of direct and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy analyses to identify patients. Predominance of blisters on hands and feet may be a clinical clue to the diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid, and these additional techniques may offer valuable tools to facilitate diagnoses.

Access to dermatologists is often limited for Medicaid enrollees. Teledermatology may improve access by bringing dermatologists to underserved communities and decreasing patient’s travel time, but the effects have rarely been assessed. In this analysis of claims data from a large California Medicaid managed care plan, Uscher-Pines et al demonstrate that primary care practices engaged in a teledermatology had a 64% increase in the fraction of patients visiting with a dermatologist. These data suggest that teledermatology offers promise for other Medicaid programs that struggle with meeting the specialty care needs of enrollees.

Physicians and patients quickly develop an opinion about each other during their initial encounter, and part of this perception is based on physician attire. In this cross-sectional, anonymous survey study of patients’ attitudes about dermatologist attire, Fox et al demonstrate that professional attire (white coat) was preferred in all clinic settings. Respondents who received a picture of a black physician were significantly more likely to exclusively prefer professional attire, while nonwhite and unemployed respondents were significantly less likely to prefer professional attire.





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.