We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence |

Speckled Lentiginous Nevi: No Longer One Single Disorder

Rudolf Happle, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(2):204. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2009.393.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


I read with interest the arguments presented by Barysch and Dummer1 on how to distinguish speckled lentiginous nevi from segmental lentiginosis. I agree that such criteria are important because these disorders are sometimes confused. However, I would like to make the following annotations.

Speckled lentiginous nevi can no longer be considered a single disorder. The authors are confusing 2 distinct entities: the macular type (nevus spilus maculosus [NSM]), which is completely flat and shows a fairly even distribution of speckles; and the papular type (nevus spilus papulosus [NSP]), which is characterized by papular speckles showing a far more uneven distribution reminiscent of a star map.2 In their text, Barysch and Dummer1 report a typical case of NSM, but in the Table they describe the distinguishing features of NSP and mention a possible association with “spinal muscle atrophy and other neurological disorders in the context of speckled lentiginous nevus syndrome.”1(p954) It is important to realize that this syndrome, which may also occur as a component of phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica,3 is always associated with NSP.2,4 Hence, it has nothing to do with the NSM as reported by Barysch and Dummer. On the other hand, being unaware of the dichotomy, the authors do not mention that NSM can be associated with nevus roseus, resulting in phacomatosis spilorosea.5



Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles