0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Observation |

Moon Jellyfish Stings FREE

Brian J. Simmons, BS1; Robert D. Griffith, MD1; Leyre A. Falto-Aizpurua, MD1; Keyvan Nouri, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(4):454-456. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.4644.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Envenomation by jellyfish is a common occurrence affecting millions of individuals yearly. Little literature exists on jellyfish stings caused by the “moon jellyfish,” Aurelia aurita. The main objective of the present report is to illustrate that A aurita stings are not as benign as once thought and to propose a treatment sequence for jellyfish stings to address the local cutaneous reactions that these stings can cause.

REPORT OF A CASE

A healthy 25-year-old white man was stung on the right wrist and forearm while scuba diving at night off of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Images of the jellyfish were captured by an underwater camera and compared with reference images to confirm the species as A aurita, otherwise known as the moon jellyfish. Of note, these particular specimens were quite large compared with ones more frequently seen. Contact with the jellyfish led to intense stinging pain followed by subsequent pruritus and the formation of urticaria after a few minutes that persisted for several hours (Figure, A).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Progression of Lesions on the Wrist and Forearm After Being Stung by Aurelia aurita

A, Three hours; B, 1 day; C, 2 days; D, 4 days; E, 6 days; F, 8 days.

Graphic Jump Location

Initial treatment aimed at removal of nematocysts followed by control of pain and pruritus. Within a few minutes of being stung, the area was exfoliated with sand mixed with seawater to remove nematocysts. Subsequently, the forearm and wrist area was soaked in warm acidic white vinegar, 5%, solution for half an hour to remove remaining nematocysts. Use of vinegar has been purported to block the discharge of nematocysts in other species of jellyfish, although reports are conflicting.1 Ibuprofen, 500 mg twice daily, was taken as an analgesic for the first 2 days.

The second step involved mitigation of the urticarial reaction and reduction of pruritus. Hydrocortisone has been shown to relieve pain and reduce inflammation due to stings from other species of jellyfish but has not been shown to treat Aaurita stings.2 A topical hydrocortisone, 1%, cream was applied to the affected area 3 times daily to control pain and inflammation. Six hours after the initial sting, vesiculopapular erythematous areas were noted, with a coalescence of vesicles over the area most affected by day 2 (Figure, B and C). Vesicles persisted until the third day and subsequently ruptured.

The area was then treated with the topical triple antibiotic combination of bacitracin zinc, neomycin sulfate, and polymyxin B sulfate 3 times daily for 3 days, and steroid applications were discontinued. Scabbing was noted shortly after rupture of the vesicles that healed with time (Figure, D and E).

After discontinuation of treatment with the triple antibiotic ointment, a pea-sized amount of aloe vera gel was applied to the affected area to soothe residual irritation. The lesions resolved by day 8 (Figure, F), 2 days sooner than reported in a case where no treatment was given3 and in a study where purified venom was applied directly to the skin.4

DISCUSSION

An in vitro study has shown that Aaurita toxin can be both hemolytic and proteolytic to human cells.5 This has led to the assertion that although the vast majority of Aaurita individuals in a particular area are innocuous, some may cause harm to humans. Herein and in an earlier report of a moon jellyfish sting,3 it was noted that the stinging animals were quite large for the species. Larger jellyfish contain larger cnidoblasts, which house the stinging nematocysts, and the larger nematocysts may penetrate the human epidermis sufficiently, unlike those of smaller specimens, to cause a local dermatologic reaction at the site of exposure.

The course of Aaurita stings involves an intense pruritic vesiculopapular erythematous eruption that lasts 10 days without intervention. However, with the use of readily available over-the-counter medications and common household ingredients, the sequelae of Aaurita stings can be managed effectively, allowing the lesions to clear earlier.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Corresponding Author: Brian J. Simmons, BS, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136 (bjsimmons@med.miami.edu).

Published Online: December 17, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.4644.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

REFERENCES

Cegolon  L, Heymann  WC, Lange  JH, Mastrangelo  G.  Jellyfish stings and their management: a review. Mar Drugs. 2013;11(2):523-550.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
De Donno  A, Idolo  A, Bagordo  F,  et al.  Impact of stinging jellyfish proliferations along south Italian coasts: human health hazards, treatment and social costs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(3):2488-2503.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Burnett  JW, Calton  GJ, Larsen  JB.  Significant envenomation by Aurelia aurita, the moon jellyfish. Toxicon. 1988;26(2):215-217.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Seugra-Puertas  L, Avila-Soria  G, Sanchez-Rodriguez  J, Ramos-Aguilar  ME, Burnett  JW.  Some toxinological aspects of Aurelia aurita (LINNÉ) from the Mexican Caribbean. J Venom Anim Toxins. 2002;8(2):269-282.
Link to Article
Radwan  FF, Burnett  JW, Bloom  DA,  et al.  A comparison of the toxinological characteristics of two Cassiopea and Aurelia species. Toxicon. 2001;39(2-3):245-257.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Progression of Lesions on the Wrist and Forearm After Being Stung by Aurelia aurita

A, Three hours; B, 1 day; C, 2 days; D, 4 days; E, 6 days; F, 8 days.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Cegolon  L, Heymann  WC, Lange  JH, Mastrangelo  G.  Jellyfish stings and their management: a review. Mar Drugs. 2013;11(2):523-550.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
De Donno  A, Idolo  A, Bagordo  F,  et al.  Impact of stinging jellyfish proliferations along south Italian coasts: human health hazards, treatment and social costs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(3):2488-2503.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Burnett  JW, Calton  GJ, Larsen  JB.  Significant envenomation by Aurelia aurita, the moon jellyfish. Toxicon. 1988;26(2):215-217.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Seugra-Puertas  L, Avila-Soria  G, Sanchez-Rodriguez  J, Ramos-Aguilar  ME, Burnett  JW.  Some toxinological aspects of Aurelia aurita (LINNÉ) from the Mexican Caribbean. J Venom Anim Toxins. 2002;8(2):269-282.
Link to Article
Radwan  FF, Burnett  JW, Bloom  DA,  et al.  A comparison of the toxinological characteristics of two Cassiopea and Aurelia species. Toxicon. 2001;39(2-3):245-257.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

875 Views
0 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Examination Positions

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Results