We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Review | Evidence-Based Dermatology

Influence of Surgical and Minimally Invasive Facial Cosmetic Procedures on Psychosocial Outcomes A Systematic Review

Sotonye Imadojemu, MD, MBE1,2; David B. Sarwer, PhD3,4,5; Ivona Percec, MD, PhD4,5,6; Seema S. Sonnad, PhD7; Jennifer E. Goldsack, MChem8; Morgan Berman, BA4; Joseph F. Sobanko, MD5,9
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
2Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
4Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
5Edwin & Fannie Gray Hall Center for Human Appearance, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
6Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
7The Value Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
8Department of History and Sociology of Science and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
9Division of Dermatologic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(11):1325-1333. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6812.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Millions of surgical and minimally invasive cosmetic procedures of the face are performed each year, but objective clinical measures that evaluate surgical procedures, such as complication rates, have limited utility when applied to cosmetic procedures. While there may be subjective improvements in appearance, it is important to determine if these interventions have an impact on patients in other realms such as psychosocial functioning. This is particularly important in light of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and its emphasis on patient-centered outcomes and effectiveness.

Objectives  To review the literature investigating the impact of facial cosmetic surgery and minimally invasive procedures on relevant psychological variables to guide clinical practice and set norms for clinical performance.

Evidence Review  English-language randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies that preoperatively and postoperatively assessed psychological variables in at least 10 patients seeking surgical or minimally invasive cosmetic procedures of the face.

Findings  Only 1 study investigating minimally invasive procedures was identified. Most studies reported modest improvement in psychosocial functioning, which included quality of life, self-esteem, and body image. Unfortunately, the overall quality of evidence is limited owing to an absence of control groups, short follow-up periods, or loss to follow-up.

Conclusions and Relevance  The current literature suggests that a number of psychosocial domains may improve following facial cosmetic surgery, although the quality of this evidence is limited (grade of recommendation 2A). Despite the dramatic rise in nonsurgical cosmetic procedures, there is a paucity of information regarding the impact of chemodenervation and soft-tissue augmentation on psychosocial functioning.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Flowchart of the Search and Selection Process

Note that 4 databases were searched and 6203 articles were initially identified. Sixteen articles were included after the screening process.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

9 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles