We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint |

Contradictory State Administrative Regulation of Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Procedures in Kentucky and North Carolina

Jason D. Gillum, JD; Robert P. Dellavalle, MD, PhD, MSPH
JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(2):137-138. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.1524.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The regulation of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures (MICPs), such as laser skin rejuvenation and hair removal, should be of keen interest to dermatologists for a number of reasons, the most important of which is patient safety.

In the United States, the US Food and Drug Administration regulates the manufacture and sale of laser equipment,1 but the state governments regulate MICPs. In all states, boards of medicine, nursing, and cosmetology perform this function. These boards generally do not operate in concert; they may make policies based on limited evidence, and particularly in today's increasingly competitive health care setting, boards may become advocates for their respective professions. Ultimately, policy makers may lose sight of true priorities such as patient safety. In the MICP setting, physician involvement is critical in ensuring proper diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, and management of complications. However, under current regulation, some MICP patients are not guaranteed physician attention. The states of North Carolina and Kentucky are case studies for this problem, as their medical and nursing boards have asserted conflicting interpretations of state law. Herein, we discuss this problem and its possible solutions.



Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
NASPGHAN Capsule Endoscopy Clinical Report. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Published online Sep 16, 2016;