We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
The Best of the Best |

Top-Accessed Article: Dressings for Acute and Chronic Wounds FREE

Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD
Arch Dermatol. 2012;148(9):1028. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2012.976.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Chaby G, Senet P, Vaneau M, et al. Dressings for acute and chronic wounds: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(10):1297-1304.

Given that dermatologists create more acute wounds than any other specialty and care for a large number of chronic wounds, this excellent article by Chaby and colleagues, in which they present a systematic review on the efficacy of modern dressings on acute and chronic wounds, was especially timely. Studying various aspects of healing, such as complete healing, time to healing, and change in wound size, among others, they extracted data from 93 studies. Although no level A studies were found for any type of dressing, hydrocolloid dressings proved superior to saline gauze or paraffin gauze dressings for the complete healing of chronic wounds, and alginates were better than other modern dressings for debriding necrotic wounds. Also, hydrofiber and foam dressings, when compared with other traditional dressings or a silver-coated dressing, respectively, reduced time to healing of acute wounds. While the quality of data was limited, this article provided continued rationale for and guidance in choosing modern dressings for wounds that dermatologists often encounter.

From October 2010 to August 2011, this article was viewed 2117 times on the Archives of Dermatology website.


Contact Dr Kirsner at the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave, Room 2023-A, Miami, FL 33136(rkirsner@med.miami.edu).





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.